Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Robust error estimates of PINN in one-dimensional boundary value problems for linear elliptic equations

Jihahm Yoo, Haesung Lee

TL;DR

This paper rigorously demonstrate the existence and uniqueness of solutions using the Sobolev space theory based on a variational approach and establishes robust error estimates of PINN regardless of the quantities of the coefficients.

Abstract

In this paper, we study physics-informed neural networks (PINN) to approximate solutions to one-dimensional boundary value problems for linear elliptic equations and establish robust error estimates of PINN regardless of the quantities of the coefficients. In particular, we rigorously demonstrate the existence and uniqueness of solutions using the Sobolev space theory based on a variational approach. Deriving $L^2$-contraction estimates, we show that the error, defined as the mean square of the differences between the true solution and our trial function at the sample points, is dominated by the training loss. Furthermore, we show that as the quantities of the coefficients for the differential equation increase, the error-to-loss ratio rapidly decreases. Our theoretical and experimental results confirm the robustness of the error regardless of the quantities of the coefficients.

Robust error estimates of PINN in one-dimensional boundary value problems for linear elliptic equations

TL;DR

This paper rigorously demonstrate the existence and uniqueness of solutions using the Sobolev space theory based on a variational approach and establishes robust error estimates of PINN regardless of the quantities of the coefficients.

Abstract

In this paper, we study physics-informed neural networks (PINN) to approximate solutions to one-dimensional boundary value problems for linear elliptic equations and establish robust error estimates of PINN regardless of the quantities of the coefficients. In particular, we rigorously demonstrate the existence and uniqueness of solutions using the Sobolev space theory based on a variational approach. Deriving -contraction estimates, we show that the error, defined as the mean square of the differences between the true solution and our trial function at the sample points, is dominated by the training loss. Furthermore, we show that as the quantities of the coefficients for the differential equation increase, the error-to-loss ratio rapidly decreases. Our theoretical and experimental results confirm the robustness of the error regardless of the quantities of the coefficients.
Paper Structure (16 sections, 17 theorems, 79 equations, 4 figures)

This paper contains 16 sections, 17 theorems, 79 equations, 4 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

Let $u \in H^{1,p}(I)$, where $p \in [1, \infty]$ and $I$ is a (possibly unbounded) open interval. Then, the following hold:

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Not effective (PINN I)
  • Figure 2: Successful (PINN II)
  • Figure 3: Comparison of Relative error between two methods as epoch increases
  • Figure 4: As $\lambda$ increases, Loss increases but Error remains robust due to the decrease of $\frac{\sf Error}{\sf Loss}$

Theorems & Definitions (23)

  • Proposition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • Proposition 2.3
  • Lemma 3.1
  • Theorem 3.2
  • Theorem 3.3: Energy estimates
  • Theorem 3.4
  • Theorem 3.5
  • Theorem 3.6
  • Example 3.7
  • ...and 13 more