Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the complexity of Maslov's class $\overline{\text{K}}$

Oskar Fiuk, Emanuel Kieronski, Vincent Michielini

TL;DR

The paper determines the exact complexity of satisfiability for Maslov's class $\overline{\text{K}}$, proving an exponential-size model property and $\text{NExpTime}$-completeness via a semantic, game-theoretic approach and a novel use of paradoxical colourful tournaments. It develops satisfiability games (VER and SAT) and leverages colour-extended tournament graphs to bound model sizes, then extends these results to conjunctions ($\overline{\text{DK}}$) and to parametrised fragments with fixed numbers of universal quantifiers. The authors also present tight lower bounds, show a parametrised upper bound depending on the universal quantifier count, and apply the framework to an extended uniform one-dimensional fragment ($\forall$-UF) by reducing its satisfiability to $\overline{\text{DK}}$-satisfiability, preserving the exponential-model property. Overall, the work sharpens the complexity landscape of several decidable fragments, clarifies the boundary between elementary and non-elementary behavior, and provides practical decidability tools for related logics and description-like frameworks.

Abstract

Maslov's class $\overline{\text{K}}$ is an expressive fragment of First-Order Logic known to have decidable satisfiability problem, whose exact complexity, however, has not been established so far. We show that $\overline{\text{K}}$ has the exponential-sized model property, and hence its satisfiability problem is NExpTime-complete. Additionally, we get new complexity results on related fragments studied in the literature, and propose a new decidable extension of the uniform one-dimensional fragment (without equality). Our approach involves a use of satisfiability games tailored to $\overline{\text{K}}$ and a novel application of paradoxical tournament graphs.

On the complexity of Maslov's class $\overline{\text{K}}$

TL;DR

The paper determines the exact complexity of satisfiability for Maslov's class , proving an exponential-size model property and -completeness via a semantic, game-theoretic approach and a novel use of paradoxical colourful tournaments. It develops satisfiability games (VER and SAT) and leverages colour-extended tournament graphs to bound model sizes, then extends these results to conjunctions () and to parametrised fragments with fixed numbers of universal quantifiers. The authors also present tight lower bounds, show a parametrised upper bound depending on the universal quantifier count, and apply the framework to an extended uniform one-dimensional fragment (-UF) by reducing its satisfiability to -satisfiability, preserving the exponential-model property. Overall, the work sharpens the complexity landscape of several decidable fragments, clarifies the boundary between elementary and non-elementary behavior, and provides practical decidability tools for related logics and description-like frameworks.

Abstract

Maslov's class is an expressive fragment of First-Order Logic known to have decidable satisfiability problem, whose exact complexity, however, has not been established so far. We show that has the exponential-sized model property, and hence its satisfiability problem is NExpTime-complete. Additionally, we get new complexity results on related fragments studied in the literature, and propose a new decidable extension of the uniform one-dimensional fragment (without equality). Our approach involves a use of satisfiability games tailored to and a novel application of paradoxical tournament graphs.
Paper Structure (23 sections, 16 theorems, 24 equations, 2 figures)

This paper contains 23 sections, 16 theorems, 24 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

theorem 1

Every satisfiable formula $\varphi$ in $\hbox{$\overline{\hbox{\rm K}}$}$ admits a finite model of size $2^{\mathcal{O}(|\varphi|\cdot \log|\varphi|)}$. Hence , the satisfiability problem for $\overline{\hbox{\rm K}}$ is NExpTime-complete.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Eloisa's move in Round 3 of $\rm{VER}(\varphi,{}{}{} , {\mathfrak{A}})$ (above) , and its simulation in $\rm{SAT}(\varphi,{}{}{} , \hbox{\large \boldmath $\beta$})$ (below).
  • Figure 2: Eloisa's responses to Abelard's choices in $\mathcal{T}$.

Theorems & Definitions (24)

  • theorem 1
  • lemma 1
  • lemma 2
  • Claim 2
  • lemma 3
  • Claim 3
  • theorem 4
  • proposition 1
  • lemma 4
  • Claim 4
  • ...and 14 more