Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Lagrangian Skeleta and Koszul Duality on Bionic Symplectic Varieties

Gwyn Bellamy, Christopher Dodd, Kevin McGerty, Thomas Nevins

TL;DR

This work extends the Riemann-Hilbert/Koszul duality paradigm to bionic symplectic varieties by constructing a deformation-quantization framework that localizes modules to the Lagrangian skeleton via a geometric category ${\mathcal O}$. It introduces a dg-algebra Omega from a local generator, establishing a derived equivalence between ${\mathcal W}$-modules and Omega-modules, and formulates an exotic/coderived perspective to realize Koszul duality in this noncommutative setting. The paper develops holonomic stability and recollment theory under open/closed inclusions and Hamiltonian reduction, and proves the existence of a holonomic local generator supported on $\Lambda^c$, with a precise reduction behavior on symplectic resolutions. Globally, it provides a concrete path from DQ-modules to Omega-modules, via a sheafified, skeleton-centered duality, enabling a Morse-theoretic, local-to-global description of module categories in geometric representation theory.

Abstract

We consider the category of modules over sheaves of Deformation-Quantization (DQ) algebras on bionic symplectic varieties. These spaces are equipped with both an elliptic $\mathbb{G}_m$-action and a Hamiltonian $\mathbb{G}_m$-action, with finitely many fixed points. On these spaces one can consider geometric category $\mathcal{O}$: the category of (holonomic) modules supported on the Lagrangian attracting set of the Hamiltonian action. We show that there exists a local generator in geometric category $\mathcal{O}$ whose dg endomorphism ring, cohomologically supported on the Lagrangian attracting set, is derived equivalent to the category of all DQ-modules. This is a version of Koszul duality generalizing the equivalence between D-modules on a smooth variety and dg-modules over the de Rham complex.

Lagrangian Skeleta and Koszul Duality on Bionic Symplectic Varieties

TL;DR

This work extends the Riemann-Hilbert/Koszul duality paradigm to bionic symplectic varieties by constructing a deformation-quantization framework that localizes modules to the Lagrangian skeleton via a geometric category . It introduces a dg-algebra Omega from a local generator, establishing a derived equivalence between -modules and Omega-modules, and formulates an exotic/coderived perspective to realize Koszul duality in this noncommutative setting. The paper develops holonomic stability and recollment theory under open/closed inclusions and Hamiltonian reduction, and proves the existence of a holonomic local generator supported on , with a precise reduction behavior on symplectic resolutions. Globally, it provides a concrete path from DQ-modules to Omega-modules, via a sheafified, skeleton-centered duality, enabling a Morse-theoretic, local-to-global description of module categories in geometric representation theory.

Abstract

We consider the category of modules over sheaves of Deformation-Quantization (DQ) algebras on bionic symplectic varieties. These spaces are equipped with both an elliptic -action and a Hamiltonian -action, with finitely many fixed points. On these spaces one can consider geometric category : the category of (holonomic) modules supported on the Lagrangian attracting set of the Hamiltonian action. We show that there exists a local generator in geometric category whose dg endomorphism ring, cohomologically supported on the Lagrangian attracting set, is derived equivalent to the category of all DQ-modules. This is a version of Koszul duality generalizing the equivalence between D-modules on a smooth variety and dg-modules over the de Rham complex.
Paper Structure (24 sections, 43 theorems, 107 equations)

This paper contains 24 sections, 43 theorems, 107 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Assume that locally free resolutions exist for coherent ${\mathcal{W}}$-modules. Then the bounded derived category of coherent ${\mathcal{W}}$-modules is equivalent to the derived category of coherent dg $\Omega$-modules:

Theorems & Definitions (82)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Corollary 1.6
  • Definition 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Lemma 2.4
  • ...and 72 more