AeroHaptix: A Wearable Vibrotactile Feedback System for Enhancing Collision Avoidance in UAV Teleoperation
Bingjian Huang, Zhecheng Wang, Qilong Cheng, Siyi Ren, Hanfeng Cai, Antonio Alvarez Valdivia, Karthik Mahadevan, Daniel Wigdor
TL;DR
Problem: UAV teleoperation suffers from limited obstacle perception and the drawbacks of force-feedback joysticks that couple input and output. Approach: AeroHaptix is a wearable vibrotactile system with 32 actuators and a perceptually optimized layout, paired with MultiCBF for multi-directional collision feedback. Contributions: hardware with low latency, a neural-network-based actuator layout optimization, and MultiCBF enabling multi-point haptic cues, demonstrated to reduce collisions and input disagreement while improving situational awareness and maintaining comparable workload. Impact: enables safer, more intuitive multi-obstacle collision avoidance for UAV teleoperation in cluttered environments.
Abstract
Haptic feedback enhances collision avoidance by providing directional obstacle information to operators during unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) teleoperation. However, such feedback is often rendered via haptic joysticks, which are unfamiliar to UAV operators and limited to single-direction force feedback. Additionally, the direct coupling between the input device and the feedback method diminishes operators' sense of control and induces oscillatory movements. To overcome these limitations, we propose AeroHaptix, a wearable haptic feedback system that uses spatial vibrations to simultaneously communicate multiple obstacle directions to operators, without interfering with their input control. The layout of vibrotactile actuators was optimized via a perceptual study to eliminate perceptual biases and achieve uniform spatial coverage. A novel rendering algorithm, MultiCBF, extended control barrier functions to support multi-directional feedback. Our system evaluation showed that compared to a no-feedback condition, AeroHaptix effectively reduced the number of collisions and input disagreement. Furthermore, operators reported that AeroHaptix was more helpful than force feedback, with improved situational awareness and comparable workload.
