Table of Contents
Fetching ...

AdaptEval: Evaluating Large Language Models on Domain Adaptation for Text Summarization

Anum Afzal, Ribin Chalumattu, Florian Matthes, Laura Mascarell

TL;DR

This work evaluates the domain adaptation abilities of a wide range of LLMs on the summarization task across various domains in both fine-tuning and in-context learning settings and presents AdaptEval, the first domain adaptation evaluation suite.

Abstract

Despite the advances in the abstractive summarization task using Large Language Models (LLM), there is a lack of research that asses their abilities to easily adapt to different domains. We evaluate the domain adaptation abilities of a wide range of LLMs on the summarization task across various domains in both fine-tuning and in-context learning settings. We also present AdaptEval, the first domain adaptation evaluation suite. AdaptEval includes a domain benchmark and a set of metrics to facilitate the analysis of domain adaptation. Our results demonstrate that LLMs exhibit comparable performance in the in-context learning setting, regardless of their parameter scale.

AdaptEval: Evaluating Large Language Models on Domain Adaptation for Text Summarization

TL;DR

This work evaluates the domain adaptation abilities of a wide range of LLMs on the summarization task across various domains in both fine-tuning and in-context learning settings and presents AdaptEval, the first domain adaptation evaluation suite.

Abstract

Despite the advances in the abstractive summarization task using Large Language Models (LLM), there is a lack of research that asses their abilities to easily adapt to different domains. We evaluate the domain adaptation abilities of a wide range of LLMs on the summarization task across various domains in both fine-tuning and in-context learning settings. We also present AdaptEval, the first domain adaptation evaluation suite. AdaptEval includes a domain benchmark and a set of metrics to facilitate the analysis of domain adaptation. Our results demonstrate that LLMs exhibit comparable performance in the in-context learning setting, regardless of their parameter scale.
Paper Structure (24 sections, 9 tables)