Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Nontriviality of rings of integral-valued polynomials

Giulio Peruginelli, Nicholas J. Werner

TL;DR

This work characterizes when rings of integral-valued polynomials $Int_{ ext{Q}}(S,\overline{\mathbb{Z}})$ are nontrivial, connecting global properties of $S$ to local $p$-adic data and valuation-theoretic phenomena. It develops a general framework over valuation domains using pseudo-monotone sequences to give necessary and sufficient conditions for nontriviality, and then translates these criteria to the local $p$-adic setting via the sets $\Sigma_p(S)$ and corresponding rings $Int_{ ext{Q}_p}(\Sigma_p(S),\overline{\mathbb{Z}_p})$. The global analysis employs polynomials like $\Psi_{p,n}$ and Dedekind’s index theorem to construct examples of trivial and nontrivial cases, investigates ramification/residue-field-boundedness as a pathway to nontriviality (and Prüfer properties), and introduces the polynomial closure to characterize when $Int_{ ext{Q}}(S,\overline{\mathbb{Z}})$ remains invariant under enlargement of $S$. The paper also proves that $ ext{Int}_{\mathbb{Q}}(\mathcal{A}_1)=\text{Int}(\mathbb{Z})$ is nontrivial and discusses open questions about polynomial closure for higher degree sets, highlighting deep interactions between arithmetic of algebraic integers and valuation-theoretic structures.

Abstract

Let $S$ be a subset of $\overline{\mathbb Z}$, the ring of all algebraic integers. A polynomial $f \in \mathbb Q[X]$ is said to be integral-valued on $S$ if $f(s) \in \overline{\mathbb Z}$ for all $s \in S$. The set $\text{Int}_{\mathbb Q}(S,\overline{\mathbb Z})$ of all integral-valued polynomials on $S$ forms a subring of $\mathbb Q[X]$ containing $\mathbb Z[X]$. We say that $\text{Int}_{\mathbb Q}(S,\overline{\mathbb Z})$ is trivial if $\text{Int}_{\mathbb Q}(S,\overline{\mathbb Z}) = \mathbb Z[X]$, and nontrivial otherwise. We give a collection of necessary and sufficient conditions on $S$ in order $\text{Int}_{\mathbb Q}(S,\overline{\mathbb Z})$ to be nontrivial. Our characterizations involve, variously, topological conditions on $S$ with respect to fixed extensions of the $p$-adic valuations to $\overline{\mathbb Q}$; pseudo-monotone sequences contained in $S$; ramification indices and residue field degrees; and the polynomial closure of $S$ in $\overline{\mathbb Z}$.

Nontriviality of rings of integral-valued polynomials

TL;DR

This work characterizes when rings of integral-valued polynomials are nontrivial, connecting global properties of to local -adic data and valuation-theoretic phenomena. It develops a general framework over valuation domains using pseudo-monotone sequences to give necessary and sufficient conditions for nontriviality, and then translates these criteria to the local -adic setting via the sets and corresponding rings . The global analysis employs polynomials like and Dedekind’s index theorem to construct examples of trivial and nontrivial cases, investigates ramification/residue-field-boundedness as a pathway to nontriviality (and Prüfer properties), and introduces the polynomial closure to characterize when remains invariant under enlargement of . The paper also proves that is nontrivial and discusses open questions about polynomial closure for higher degree sets, highlighting deep interactions between arithmetic of algebraic integers and valuation-theoretic structures.

Abstract

Let be a subset of , the ring of all algebraic integers. A polynomial is said to be integral-valued on if for all . The set of all integral-valued polynomials on forms a subring of containing . We say that is trivial if , and nontrivial otherwise. We give a collection of necessary and sufficient conditions on in order to be nontrivial. Our characterizations involve, variously, topological conditions on with respect to fixed extensions of the -adic valuations to ; pseudo-monotone sequences contained in ; ramification indices and residue field degrees; and the polynomial closure of in .
Paper Structure (6 sections, 30 theorems, 49 equations)

This paper contains 6 sections, 30 theorems, 49 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.4

Let $S \subseteq V$. Assume there exist a finite subset $T \subseteq S$ and $b \in M$ such that for all $s \in S$, there exists $t \in T$ such that $v(s - t) \geq v(b)$.

Theorems & Definitions (84)

  • Definition 1.2
  • Example 1.3
  • Definition 1.4
  • Example 1.5
  • Example 1.6
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • ...and 74 more