Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Randomized Method for Simulating Lindblad Equations and Thermal State Preparation

Hongrui Chen, Bowen Li, Jianfeng Lu, Lexing Ying

TL;DR

This work develops a qDRIFT-style randomized method for simulating Lindblad dynamics by decomposing the generator into an ensemble of Lindbladians and sampling a single member per time step, reducing quantum-cost overhead when many jump operators are present. The authors provide non-asymptotic convergence guarantees for both the average-channel and typical random realizations, extending qDRIFT concepts from closed to open quantum systems. A key contribution is the Clifford-random Davies generator, a practically implementable quantum Gibbs sampler whose mixing time is tied to the Hamiltonian spectrum via a spectral-gap bound; under suitable conditions (efficient Hamiltonian simulation and non-negligible low-energy density), this yields provable efficient thermal-state preparation, with explicit bounds in terms of the system’s spectrum. The framework thus offers a new path to scalable thermalization and Gibbs sampling for strongly interacting quantum systems, leveraging randomness to simplify implementation while preserving rigorous convergence properties. Potential direction includes extending to higher-order randomized schemes and establishing concentration results for random-channel realizations.

Abstract

We study a qDRIFT-type randomized method to simulate Lindblad dynamics by decomposing its generator into an ensemble of Lindbladians, $\mathcal{L} = \sum_{a \in \mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}_a$, where each $\mathcal{L}_a$ comprises a simple Hamiltonian and a single jump operator. Assuming an efficient quantum simulation is available for the Lindblad evolution $e^{t\mathcal{L}_a}$, we implement $e^{t\mathcal{L}_a}$ for a randomly sampled $\mathcal{L}_a$ at each time step according to a probability distribution $μ$ over the ensemble $\{\mathcal{L}_a\}_{a \in \mathcal{A}}$. This randomized strategy reduces the quantum cost of simulating Lindblad dynamics, particularly in quantum many-body systems with a large or even infinite number of jump operators. Our contributions are two-fold. First, we provide a detailed convergence analysis of the proposed randomized method, covering both average and typical algorithmic realizations. This analysis extends the known results for the random product formula from closed systems to open systems, ensuring rigorous performance guarantees. Second, based on the random product approximation, we derive a new quantum Gibbs sampler algorithm that utilizes jump operators sampled from a Clifford-random circuit. This generator (i) can be efficiently implemented using our randomized algorithm, and (ii) exhibits a spectral gap lower bound that depends on the spectrum of the Hamiltonian. Our results present a new instance of a class of Hamiltonians for which the thermal states can be efficiently prepared using a quantum Gibbs sampling algorithm.

A Randomized Method for Simulating Lindblad Equations and Thermal State Preparation

TL;DR

This work develops a qDRIFT-style randomized method for simulating Lindblad dynamics by decomposing the generator into an ensemble of Lindbladians and sampling a single member per time step, reducing quantum-cost overhead when many jump operators are present. The authors provide non-asymptotic convergence guarantees for both the average-channel and typical random realizations, extending qDRIFT concepts from closed to open quantum systems. A key contribution is the Clifford-random Davies generator, a practically implementable quantum Gibbs sampler whose mixing time is tied to the Hamiltonian spectrum via a spectral-gap bound; under suitable conditions (efficient Hamiltonian simulation and non-negligible low-energy density), this yields provable efficient thermal-state preparation, with explicit bounds in terms of the system’s spectrum. The framework thus offers a new path to scalable thermalization and Gibbs sampling for strongly interacting quantum systems, leveraging randomness to simplify implementation while preserving rigorous convergence properties. Potential direction includes extending to higher-order randomized schemes and establishing concentration results for random-channel realizations.

Abstract

We study a qDRIFT-type randomized method to simulate Lindblad dynamics by decomposing its generator into an ensemble of Lindbladians, , where each comprises a simple Hamiltonian and a single jump operator. Assuming an efficient quantum simulation is available for the Lindblad evolution , we implement for a randomly sampled at each time step according to a probability distribution over the ensemble . This randomized strategy reduces the quantum cost of simulating Lindblad dynamics, particularly in quantum many-body systems with a large or even infinite number of jump operators. Our contributions are two-fold. First, we provide a detailed convergence analysis of the proposed randomized method, covering both average and typical algorithmic realizations. This analysis extends the known results for the random product formula from closed systems to open systems, ensuring rigorous performance guarantees. Second, based on the random product approximation, we derive a new quantum Gibbs sampler algorithm that utilizes jump operators sampled from a Clifford-random circuit. This generator (i) can be efficiently implemented using our randomized algorithm, and (ii) exhibits a spectral gap lower bound that depends on the spectrum of the Hamiltonian. Our results present a new instance of a class of Hamiltonians for which the thermal states can be efficiently prepared using a quantum Gibbs sampling algorithm.
Paper Structure (24 sections, 23 theorems, 148 equations)

This paper contains 24 sections, 23 theorems, 148 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 2

Suppose the symmetrized Lindbladian $\frac{1}{2}(\mathcal{L}^\dag + \mathcal{L}^{\mathrm{KMS}})$ is primitive with spectral gap $\eta > 0$, where $\mathcal{L}^{\mathrm{KMS}}$ denotes the adjoint of $\mathcal{L}^\dag$ with respect to the KMS inner product. Then, for any quantum state $\rho$ and time

Theorems & Definitions (44)

  • Definition 1
  • Proposition 2: temme2010chi
  • Lemma 3
  • Theorem 4
  • Corollary 5
  • Remark 1: Comparison with existing and concurrent works
  • Lemma 6
  • Theorem 7
  • Corollary 8
  • proof
  • ...and 34 more