Table of Contents
Fetching ...

$θ$-free matching covered graphs

Rohinee Joshi, Santhosh Raghul, Nishad Kothari

TL;DR

We address the characterization of $\theta$-free matching covered graphs (and, analogously, $K_4$-free cases) and the corresponding decision problems. The authors leverage the tight cut decomposition theory for matching covered graphs due to Edmonds, Lovász and Pulleyblank to develop their characterization. They obtain a poly-time algorithm for deciding $\theta$-freeness, and derive size bounds $m \le 2n-1$ and $m \le \frac{3n}{2}+b-1$, where $b$ is the number of bricks in any tight cut decomposition; they also characterize the tight examples. The Petersen graph and $K_4$ play central roles, and the results connect to previous planar-characterization work by Kothari and Murty and open problems in the nonplanar case.

Abstract

A nontrivial connected graph is matching covered if each edge belongs to some perfect matching. For most problems pertaining to perfect matchings, one may restrict attention to matching covered graphs; thus, there is extensive literature on them. A cornerstone of this theory is an ear decomposition result due to Lovász and Plummer. Their theorem is a fundamental problem-solving tool, and also yields interesting open problems; we discuss two such problems below, and we solve one of them. A subgraph $H$ of a graph $G$ is conformal if $G-V(H)$ has a perfect matching. This notion is intrinsically related to the aforementioned ear decomposition theorem -- which implies that each matching covered graph (apart from $K_2$ and even cycles) contains a conformal bisubdivision of $θ$, or a conformal bisubdivision of $K_4$, possibly both. (Here, $θ$ refers to the graph with two vertices joined by three edges.) This immediately leads to two problems: characterize $θ$-free (likewise, $K_4$-free) matching covered graphs. A characterization of planar $K_4$-free matching covered graphs was obtained by Kothari and Murty [J. Graph Theory, 82 (1), 2016]; the nonplanar case is open. We provide a characterization of $θ$-free matching covered graphs that immediately implies a poly-time algorithm for the corresponding decision problem. Our characterization relies heavily on a seminal result due to Edmonds, Lovász and Pulleyblank [Combinatorica, 2, 1982] pertaining to the tight cut decomposition theory of matching covered graphs. As corollaries, we provide two upper bounds on the size of a $θ$-free graph, namely, $m\leq 2n-1$ and $m\leq \frac{3n}{2}+b-1$, where $b$ denotes the number of bricks obtained in any tight cut decomposition of the graph; for each bound, we provide a characterization of the tight examples. The Petersen graph and $K_4$ play key roles in our results.

$θ$-free matching covered graphs

TL;DR

We address the characterization of -free matching covered graphs (and, analogously, -free cases) and the corresponding decision problems. The authors leverage the tight cut decomposition theory for matching covered graphs due to Edmonds, Lovász and Pulleyblank to develop their characterization. They obtain a poly-time algorithm for deciding -freeness, and derive size bounds and , where is the number of bricks in any tight cut decomposition; they also characterize the tight examples. The Petersen graph and play central roles, and the results connect to previous planar-characterization work by Kothari and Murty and open problems in the nonplanar case.

Abstract

A nontrivial connected graph is matching covered if each edge belongs to some perfect matching. For most problems pertaining to perfect matchings, one may restrict attention to matching covered graphs; thus, there is extensive literature on them. A cornerstone of this theory is an ear decomposition result due to Lovász and Plummer. Their theorem is a fundamental problem-solving tool, and also yields interesting open problems; we discuss two such problems below, and we solve one of them. A subgraph of a graph is conformal if has a perfect matching. This notion is intrinsically related to the aforementioned ear decomposition theorem -- which implies that each matching covered graph (apart from and even cycles) contains a conformal bisubdivision of , or a conformal bisubdivision of , possibly both. (Here, refers to the graph with two vertices joined by three edges.) This immediately leads to two problems: characterize -free (likewise, -free) matching covered graphs. A characterization of planar -free matching covered graphs was obtained by Kothari and Murty [J. Graph Theory, 82 (1), 2016]; the nonplanar case is open. We provide a characterization of -free matching covered graphs that immediately implies a poly-time algorithm for the corresponding decision problem. Our characterization relies heavily on a seminal result due to Edmonds, Lovász and Pulleyblank [Combinatorica, 2, 1982] pertaining to the tight cut decomposition theory of matching covered graphs. As corollaries, we provide two upper bounds on the size of a -free graph, namely, and , where denotes the number of bricks obtained in any tight cut decomposition of the graph; for each bound, we provide a characterization of the tight examples. The Petersen graph and play key roles in our results.
Paper Structure (1 section, 1 figure)

This paper contains 1 section, 1 figure.

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction and summary

Figures (1)

  • Figure :