The Solution for the 5th GCAIAC Zero-shot Referring Expression Comprehension Challenge
Longfei Huang, Feng Yu, Zhihao Guan, Zhonghua Wan, Yang Yang
TL;DR
The paper tackles zero-shot referring expression comprehension by exploiting pre-trained vision-language models through a prompt-driven framework. It introduces a tripartite approach: (1) coarse- and fine-grained visual prompts to emphasize target regions, (2) text redundancy reduction to sharpen CLIP’s image-text alignment, and (3) a joint prediction mechanism using aggregation and the Hungarian algorithm to handle multiple descriptions and entries. Key contributions include the multi-granularity prompt strategy, efficient textual denoising, and a robust prediction scheme, achieving substantial gains and first-place performance on the A leaderboard (84.825) and competitive results on the B leaderboard (71.460). The work demonstrates that careful prompt engineering and inference-time joint reasoning can unlock strong zero-shot localization capabilities in multimodal models, providing a practical pathway for zero-shot visual grounding applications.
Abstract
This report presents a solution for the zero-shot referring expression comprehension task. Visual-language multimodal base models (such as CLIP, SAM) have gained significant attention in recent years as a cornerstone of mainstream research. One of the key applications of multimodal base models lies in their ability to generalize to zero-shot downstream tasks. Unlike traditional referring expression comprehension, zero-shot referring expression comprehension aims to apply pre-trained visual-language models directly to the task without specific training. Recent studies have enhanced the zero-shot performance of multimodal base models in referring expression comprehension tasks by introducing visual prompts. To address the zero-shot referring expression comprehension challenge, we introduced a combination of visual prompts and considered the influence of textual prompts, employing joint prediction tailored to the data characteristics. Ultimately, our approach achieved accuracy rates of 84.825 on the A leaderboard and 71.460 on the B leaderboard, securing the first position.
