Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A General Maximum Principle for Progressive Optimal Control of Fully Coupled Forward-Backward Stochastic Systems with Jumps

Bin Wang, Yu Si, Jingtao Shi

TL;DR

This work addresses stochastic control problems driven by fully coupled forward-backward SDEs with jumps, allowing nonconvex control domains and a diffusion term that depends on the jump variable $e$. It develops a general maximum principle using spike variation and a pair of adjoint BSDEs, with a Hamiltonian that incorporates the jump structure and $e$-dependent $Z$-term, and proves an inequality that the optimal control must satisfy for all admissible controls. The authors establish $L^p$-estimates and well-posedness for fully coupled FBSDEPs with jumps under their assumptions, enabling rigorous derivation of the maximum principle. The results extend classical maximum principles to nonconvex controls and jump-driven systems, broadening the applicability to areas such as recursive utility in finance and economics where jumps and $Z$-dependence on $e$ are essential. The framework unifies and extends prior theories, providing a foundation for further exploration of optimal control in systems with both continuous fluctuations and abrupt events.

Abstract

This paper is concerned with a general maximum principle for the fully coupled forward-backward stochastic optimal control problem with jumps, where the control domain is not necessarily convex, within the progressively measurable framework. A distinct feature in this paper is that the solution $Z$ of BSDEPs could include the variable ``$e$'', further, the diffusion term of BSDEPs takes the form $\int_{\mathcal{E}}Z_{(t,e)}ν(d e)d W_t$ rather than the conventional $Z_t dW_t$, reflecting the essential coupling between the solution component $Z$ and the Polish space $\mathcal{E}$.

A General Maximum Principle for Progressive Optimal Control of Fully Coupled Forward-Backward Stochastic Systems with Jumps

TL;DR

This work addresses stochastic control problems driven by fully coupled forward-backward SDEs with jumps, allowing nonconvex control domains and a diffusion term that depends on the jump variable . It develops a general maximum principle using spike variation and a pair of adjoint BSDEs, with a Hamiltonian that incorporates the jump structure and -dependent -term, and proves an inequality that the optimal control must satisfy for all admissible controls. The authors establish -estimates and well-posedness for fully coupled FBSDEPs with jumps under their assumptions, enabling rigorous derivation of the maximum principle. The results extend classical maximum principles to nonconvex controls and jump-driven systems, broadening the applicability to areas such as recursive utility in finance and economics where jumps and -dependence on are essential. The framework unifies and extends prior theories, providing a foundation for further exploration of optimal control in systems with both continuous fluctuations and abrupt events.

Abstract

This paper is concerned with a general maximum principle for the fully coupled forward-backward stochastic optimal control problem with jumps, where the control domain is not necessarily convex, within the progressively measurable framework. A distinct feature in this paper is that the solution of BSDEPs could include the variable ``'', further, the diffusion term of BSDEPs takes the form rather than the conventional , reflecting the essential coupling between the solution component and the Polish space .
Paper Structure (10 sections, 7 theorems, 105 equations)

This paper contains 10 sections, 7 theorems, 105 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

For any stochastic processes $\left(y_\cdot,z_{(\cdot,\cdot)},\tilde{z}_{(\cdot,\cdot)}\right)\in \mathscr{N}^p[0,T]$, consider the following FBSDEP: where $b,\sigma,g:[0,T]\times\mathbf{R}\times\mathbf{R}\times\mathcal{L}^2\times\mathcal{L}^2\times\mathbf{U}\rightarrow\mathbf{R}$ , $f:[0,T]\times\mathbf{R}\times\mathbf{R}\times\mathcal{L}^2\times\mathcal{L}^2\times\mathbf{U}\times\mathcal{E}\rig

Theorems & Definitions (18)

  • Remark 2.1
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Lemma 3.1
  • Remark 3.1
  • Remark 3.2
  • Lemma 3.2
  • Lemma 3.3
  • ...and 8 more