On the performance of sequential Bayesian update for database of diverse tsunami scenarios
Reika Nomura, Louise A. Hirao Vermare, Saneiki Fujita, Donsub Rim, Shuji Moriguchi, Randall J. LeVeque, Kenjiro Terada
TL;DR
This work evaluates a sequential Bayesian tsunami-scenario-detection framework on a diverse database of complex fault-slip patterns, comparing scenario superposition (weighted mean) with the prior most-likely method and benchmarking against DTW. It leverages proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) to extract wave-history features and updates posterior probabilities via a Mahalanobis-distance-based likelihood, applied to 1771 Westport Cascadia scenarios filtered from a larger synthetic dataset. Key findings show that a 3–4 minute observation window generally suffices for accurate predictions; the weighted-mean approach improves inundation-trend predictions but does not consistently beat the most likely method or the DTW benchmark, highlighting limitations in the current probabilistic update for scenario superposition. The study suggests reformulating the probability update to treat multiple scenarios as simultaneous contributors, which could unlock more accurate and timely tsunami risk assessments for evacuation planning in diverse, real-world settings.
Abstract
Although the sequential tsunami scenario detection framework was validated in our previous work, several tasks remain to be resolved from a practical point of view. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the previous tsunami scenario detection framework using a diverse database consisting of complex fault rupture patterns with heterogeneous slip distributions. Specifically, we compare the effectiveness of scenario superposition to that of the previous most likely scenario detection method. Additionally, how the length of the observation time window influences the accuracy of both methods is analyzed. We utilize an existing database comprising 1771 tsunami scenarios targeting the city Westport (WA, U.S.), which includes synthetic wave height records and inundation distributions as the result of fault rupture in the Cascadia subduction zone. The heterogeneous patterns of slips used in the database increase the diversity of the scenarios and thus make it a proper database for evaluating the performance of scenario superposition. To assess the performance, we consider various observation time windows shorter than 15 minutes and divide the database into five testing and learning sets. The evaluation accuracy of the maximum offshore wave, inundation depth, and its distribution is analyzed to examine the advantages of the scenario superposition method over the previous method. We introduce the dynamic time warping (DTW) method as an additional benchmark and compare its results to that of the Bayesian scenario detection method.
