Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The reverse mathematics of the pigeonhole hierarchy

Quentin Le Houérou, Ludovic Levy Patey, Ahmed Mimouni

TL;DR

This work analyzes the infinite pigeonhole principle across the arithmetical hierarchy within $\\mathsf{RCA}_0$, proving the resulting hierarchy is strict and mapping its first-order consequences via sophisticated forcing methods. Central to the approach is iterated jump control, strengthened by forcing with trees, Scott towers, and largeness towers, to obtain low${}_{n+1}$ and weakly low${}_n$ bases for $\\Sigma^0_{n+1}-\\mathsf{Subset}$ and to preserve hyperimmunities. The authors establish $\\Pi^1_1$-conservativity results for these principles over suitable bases, connect the hierarchy to the Ginsburg–Sands theorem and cohesiveness, and derive ω-model separations between levels, contributing a broad, modular framework for the computational content of combinatorial theorems. The findings advance a program to understand the computational content of Ramsey-type results and their proof-theoretic strength, with implications for conservation and equivalence phenomena in reverse mathematics.

Abstract

The infinite pigeonhole principle for $k$ colors ($\mathsf{RT}_k$) states, for every $k$-partition $A_0 \sqcup \dots \sqcup A_{k-1} = \mathbb{N}$, the existence of an infinite subset~$H \subseteq A_i$ for some~$i < k$. This seemingly trivial combinatorial principle constitutes the basis of Ramsey's theory, and plays a very important role in computability and proof theory. In this article, we study the infinite pigeonhole principle at various levels of the arithmetical hierarchy from both a computability-theoretic and reverse mathematical viewpoint. We prove that this hierarchy is strict over~$\mathsf{RCA}_0$ using an elaborate iterated jump control construction, and study its first-order consequences. This is part of a large meta-mathematical program studying the computational content of combinatorial theorems.

The reverse mathematics of the pigeonhole hierarchy

TL;DR

This work analyzes the infinite pigeonhole principle across the arithmetical hierarchy within , proving the resulting hierarchy is strict and mapping its first-order consequences via sophisticated forcing methods. Central to the approach is iterated jump control, strengthened by forcing with trees, Scott towers, and largeness towers, to obtain low and weakly low bases for and to preserve hyperimmunities. The authors establish -conservativity results for these principles over suitable bases, connect the hierarchy to the Ginsburg–Sands theorem and cohesiveness, and derive ω-model separations between levels, contributing a broad, modular framework for the computational content of combinatorial theorems. The findings advance a program to understand the computational content of Ramsey-type results and their proof-theoretic strength, with implications for conservation and equivalence phenomena in reverse mathematics.

Abstract

The infinite pigeonhole principle for colors () states, for every -partition , the existence of an infinite subset~ for some~. This seemingly trivial combinatorial principle constitutes the basis of Ramsey's theory, and plays a very important role in computability and proof theory. In this article, we study the infinite pigeonhole principle at various levels of the arithmetical hierarchy from both a computability-theoretic and reverse mathematical viewpoint. We prove that this hierarchy is strict over~ using an elaborate iterated jump control construction, and study its first-order consequences. This is part of a large meta-mathematical program studying the computational content of combinatorial theorems.
Paper Structure (28 sections, 75 theorems, 23 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 28 sections, 75 theorems, 23 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 1.3

$\mathsf{RCA}_0 \vdash \mathsf{RT}^2_2 \leftrightarrow \mathsf{COH} + {\Delta^0_2}\hbox{-}\mathsf{Subset}$.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Summary table of the previously known bounds and the new bounds in terms of low basis theorems. The new basis theorem proven in this article completes the table with tight bounds.

Theorems & Definitions (187)

  • Theorem 1.3: cholak2001strengthmileti2004partitionchong2010role
  • Definition 1.4
  • Definition 1.5
  • Definition 1.7
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Theorem 2.3: monin201pigeons
  • proof
  • Definition 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5: monin201pigeons
  • ...and 177 more