Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Nonconforming Virtual Element Method for Advection-Diffusion-Reaction Problems with CIP Stabilization

Carlo Lovadina, Ilaria Perugia, Manuel Trezzi

Abstract

We study a nonconforming virtual element method (VEM) for advection-diffusion-reaction problems with continuous interior penalty (CIP) stabilization. The design of the method is based on a standard variational formulation of the problem (no skew-symmetrization), and boundary conditions are imposed with a Nitsche technique. We use the enhanced version of VEM, with a ``DoFi-DoFi'' stabilization in the diffusion and reaction terms. We prove stability of the proposed method and derive $h$-version error estimates.

A Nonconforming Virtual Element Method for Advection-Diffusion-Reaction Problems with CIP Stabilization

Abstract

We study a nonconforming virtual element method (VEM) for advection-diffusion-reaction problems with continuous interior penalty (CIP) stabilization. The design of the method is based on a standard variational formulation of the problem (no skew-symmetrization), and boundary conditions are imposed with a Nitsche technique. We use the enhanced version of VEM, with a ``DoFi-DoFi'' stabilization in the diffusion and reaction terms. We prove stability of the proposed method and derive -version error estimates.
Paper Structure (13 sections, 19 theorems, 154 equations, 4 figures)

This paper contains 13 sections, 19 theorems, 154 equations, 4 figures.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

Under assumption (A1), for any $E \in \Omega_h$ and for any sufficiently smooth function $\varphi$ defined on $E$, we have that

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Degrees of freedom for a penthagon.
  • Figure 2: Example of meshes used for the tests.
  • Figure 3: Convergences for $u_1$ (left column) and $u_2$(right column).
  • Figure 4: Results for various choice of $\varepsilon$.

Theorems & Definitions (38)

  • Lemma 2.1: Polynomial approximation
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Remark 2.1
  • Lemma 2.3: Approximation with nonconforming virtual element functions
  • Proposition 3.1: Inverse inequality
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.1: Inverse trace inequality
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.1
  • ...and 28 more