Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Totally symmetric Grassmannian codes

Matthew Fickus, Joseph W. Iverson, John Jasper, Dustin G. Mixon

Abstract

We introduce a general technique to construct tight fusion frames with prescribed symmetries. Applying this technique with a prescription for "all the symmetries", we construct a new family of equi-isoclinic tight fusion frames (EITFFs), which consequently form optimal Grassmannian codes. By virtue of their construction, our EITFFs have the remarkable property of total symmetry: any permutation of subspaces can be achieved by an appropriate unitary.

Totally symmetric Grassmannian codes

Abstract

We introduce a general technique to construct tight fusion frames with prescribed symmetries. Applying this technique with a prescription for "all the symmetries", we construct a new family of equi-isoclinic tight fusion frames (EITFFs), which consequently form optimal Grassmannian codes. By virtue of their construction, our EITFFs have the remarkable property of total symmetry: any permutation of subspaces can be achieved by an appropriate unitary.
Paper Structure (14 sections, 10 theorems, 88 equations, 3 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 14 sections, 10 theorems, 88 equations, 3 figures, 2 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 3.1

Let $G$ be a finite group acting transitively on a set $X$ via $\sigma \colon G \to S_X$. Fix a base point $x_0 \in X$ with stabilizer $H \leq G$, and select a transversal $\{ t_x \}_{x\in X}$ of elements in $G$ such that $\sigma(t_x) x_0 = x$ for each $x \in X$. Next, let $\rho \colon G \to \operat

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: (a) The Young diagram with shape $\mu := (4,2^2)$, where removable boxes are colored blue. (b) A standard tableau $T \in \operatorname{Tab}(\mu)$. (c) The action of a transposition on $T$. (d) The embedding of $T$ into $\operatorname{Tab}(\lambda)$ for $\lambda := (4,3,2) \in \mu^\uparrow$, where the $\lambda-\mu$ box is colored red. (e) Hook lengths for $\mu$, where one hook is colored green.
  • Figure 2: Illustration of the Young diagrams for cases (i)--(iii) of Theorem \ref{['thm: single layer']}, where the red box belongs to $\lambda$ but not $\mu$, and where the removable boxes of $\mu$ are colored blue.
  • Figure 3: Let $\mu$ be a partition with $m$ distinct parts. Then we label $\lfloor \mu \rfloor = \{ (k_1,l_1),\dotsc,(k_m,l_m) \}$ by descending superdiagonal order, and $\mu^\uparrow = \{ \lambda_1,\dotsc,\lambda_{m+1}\}$ by descending superdiagonal order of differences with $\mu$.

Theorems & Definitions (39)

  • Theorem 3.1
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['thm: one layer general group']}
  • Remark 3.2
  • Example 3.3
  • Example 3.4
  • Example 3.5
  • Example 3.6
  • Example 3.7
  • Example 3.8
  • Example 3.9
  • ...and 29 more