Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Classical ideals theory of maximal subrings in non-commutative rings

Alborz Azarang

TL;DR

This work analyzes how central ring-theoretic ideals behave under maximal subring extensions in noncommutative rings. It develops a conductor-ideals framework and bracketed decompositions, establishing key equalities such as $Nil_*(R)=Nil_*(T)\cap R$ and $Nil^*(R)=Nil^*(T)\cap R$, and, in the reduced case, a dichotomy $Z({}_RT)=0$ or $T=R\oplus Z({}_RT)$ with $(R:T)=(R:T)_l=(R:T)_r=ann_R(Z({}_RT))$. In the case $T=R\oplus I$, the paper tightly relates radicals, socle, and singular ideals of $R$ and $T$ via contractions and decompositions, and analyzes the prime/semiprime/primitive structure of $T$ in terms of $I$ and its square. For left Artinian maximal subrings, it gives a detailed spectrum-theoretic and module-theoretic picture, including a matrix-ring decomposition $T/(R:T)\cong \mathbb{M}_n(S)$ with $S$ restricted to at most two nonzero proper ideals, yielding a clear dichotomy between $T$ remaining left Artinian or $S$ having a highly constrained ideal structure. Overall, the results provide precise interdependencies among radicals, socles, and centers across maximal subring extensions, with sharp structural classifications in reduced and Artinian settings.

Abstract

Let $R$ be a maximal subring of a ring $T$. In this paper we study relation between some important ideals in the ring extension $R\subseteq T$. In fact, we would like to find some relation between $Nil_*(R)$ and $Nil_*(T)$, $Nil^*(R)$ and $Nil^*(T)$, $J(R)$ and $J(T)$, $Soc({}_RR)$ and $Soc({}_RT)$, and finally $Z({}_RR)$ and $Z({}_RT)$; especially, in certain cases, for example when $T$ is a reduced ring, $R$ (or $T$) is a left Artinian ring, or $R$ is a certain maximal subring of $T$. We show that either $Soc({}_RR)=Soc({}_RT)$ or $(R:T)_r$ (the greatest right ideal of $T$ which is contained in $R$) is a left primitive ideal of $R$. We prove that if $T$ is a reduced ring, then either $Z({}_RT)=0$ or $Z({}_RT)$ is a minimal ideal of $T$, $T=R\oplus Z({}_RT)$, and $(R:T)=(R:T)_l=(R:T)_r=ann_R(Z({}_RT))$. If $T=R\oplus I$, where $I$ is an ideal of $T$, then we completely determine relation between Jacobson radicals, lower nilradicals, upper nilradicals, socle and singular ideals of $R$ and $T$. Finally, we study the relation between previous ideals of $R$ and $T$ when either $R$ or $T$ is a left Artinian ring.

Classical ideals theory of maximal subrings in non-commutative rings

TL;DR

This work analyzes how central ring-theoretic ideals behave under maximal subring extensions in noncommutative rings. It develops a conductor-ideals framework and bracketed decompositions, establishing key equalities such as and , and, in the reduced case, a dichotomy or with . In the case , the paper tightly relates radicals, socle, and singular ideals of and via contractions and decompositions, and analyzes the prime/semiprime/primitive structure of in terms of and its square. For left Artinian maximal subrings, it gives a detailed spectrum-theoretic and module-theoretic picture, including a matrix-ring decomposition with restricted to at most two nonzero proper ideals, yielding a clear dichotomy between remaining left Artinian or having a highly constrained ideal structure. Overall, the results provide precise interdependencies among radicals, socles, and centers across maximal subring extensions, with sharp structural classifications in reduced and Artinian settings.

Abstract

Let be a maximal subring of a ring . In this paper we study relation between some important ideals in the ring extension . In fact, we would like to find some relation between and , and , and , and , and finally and ; especially, in certain cases, for example when is a reduced ring, (or ) is a left Artinian ring, or is a certain maximal subring of . We show that either or (the greatest right ideal of which is contained in ) is a left primitive ideal of . We prove that if is a reduced ring, then either or is a minimal ideal of , , and . If , where is an ideal of , then we completely determine relation between Jacobson radicals, lower nilradicals, upper nilradicals, socle and singular ideals of and . Finally, we study the relation between previous ideals of and when either or is a left Artinian ring.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 34 theorems)

This paper contains 8 sections, 34 theorems.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

azq. Let $R_1$ and $R_2$ be rings and $T=R_1\times R_2$. Then $T$ has a maximal subring if and only if at least one of the following conditions holds:

Theorems & Definitions (70)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Lemma 1.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • ...and 60 more