Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Constructions of Turán systems that are tight up to a multiplicative constant

Oleg Pikhurko

TL;DR

The paper investigates Turán $(n,s,r)$-systems and their asymptotic density $t(s,r)$, establishing that the trivial lower bound is tight up to a multiplicative constant for all fixed $R$ by constructing $t(r+R,r)\le (\mu_R+o(1))/{{r+R}\choose R}$ with $\mu_R=(1+o(1))R\ln R$. It introduces a recursive probabilistic framework that builds Turán $(n,r+R,r)$-systems via extensions $S^*$ and $T^*$ and a base construction $H_n^r$, yielding explicit constants for the base case $t(r+1,r)$ (e.g., $t(n,r+1,r)\le 6.239/(r+1)$ and $\le 4.911/(r+1)$ for large $r$). The analysis hinges on choosing parameters $\beta,c,\mu$ and a root $c_0$ of $e^{c}=(c+1)^{R+1}$ to optimize the bound, and extends to general $R$ with a small additive term $D/\ln(r+3)$. These results resolve a long-standing conjecture (disproving de Caen's $rt(r+1,r)\to\infty$) and advance extremal hypergraph theory by demonstrating near-tightness relative to the trivial lower bound and providing constructive approaches with potential algorithmic applications.

Abstract

For positive integers $n\ge s> r$, the Turán function $T(n,s,r)$ is the smallest size of an r-graph with n vertices such that every set of s vertices contains at least one edge. Also, define the Turán density $t(s,r)$ as the limit of $T(n,s,r)/ {n\choose r}$ as $n\to\infty$. The question of estimating these parameters received a lot of attention after it was first raised by Turán in 1941. A trivial lower bound is $t(s,r)\ge 1/{s\choose s-r}$. In the early 1990s, de Caen conjectured that $r\cdot t(r+1,r)\to\infty$ as $r\to\infty$ and offered 500 Canadian dollars for resolving this question. We disprove this conjecture by showing more strongly that for every integer $R\ge1$ there is $μ_R$ (in fact, $μ_R$ can be taken to grow as $(1+o(1))\, R\ln R$) such that $t(r+R,r)\le (μ_R+o(1))/ {r+R\choose R}$ as $r\to\infty$, that is, the trivial lower bound is tight for every $R$ up to a multiplicative constant $μ_R$.

Constructions of Turán systems that are tight up to a multiplicative constant

TL;DR

The paper investigates Turán -systems and their asymptotic density , establishing that the trivial lower bound is tight up to a multiplicative constant for all fixed by constructing with . It introduces a recursive probabilistic framework that builds Turán -systems via extensions and and a base construction , yielding explicit constants for the base case (e.g., and for large ). The analysis hinges on choosing parameters and a root of to optimize the bound, and extends to general with a small additive term . These results resolve a long-standing conjecture (disproving de Caen's ) and advance extremal hypergraph theory by demonstrating near-tightness relative to the trivial lower bound and providing constructive approaches with potential algorithmic applications.

Abstract

For positive integers , the Turán function is the smallest size of an r-graph with n vertices such that every set of s vertices contains at least one edge. Also, define the Turán density as the limit of as . The question of estimating these parameters received a lot of attention after it was first raised by Turán in 1941. A trivial lower bound is . In the early 1990s, de Caen conjectured that as and offered 500 Canadian dollars for resolving this question. We disprove this conjecture by showing more strongly that for every integer there is (in fact, can be taken to grow as ) such that as , that is, the trivial lower bound is tight for every up to a multiplicative constant .
Paper Structure (3 sections, 5 theorems, 22 equations)

This paper contains 3 sections, 5 theorems, 22 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

For all integers $n> r\geqslant 1$, it holds that $T(n,r+1,r)\leqslant \frac{6.239}{r+1}\,{n\choose r}$. Also, there is $r_0$ such that, for all integers $n>r\geqslant r_0$, it holds that $T(n,r+1,r)\leqslant \frac{4.911}{r+1}\,{n\choose r}$.

Theorems & Definitions (6)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Corollary 1.3
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3