Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Turning the Tide on Dark Pools? Towards Multi-Stakeholder Vulnerability Notifications in the Ad-Tech Supply Chain

Yash Vekaria, Rishab Nithyanand, Zubair Shafiq

TL;DR

This paper investigates dark pooling in the online advertising supply chain and tests vulnerability notifications as a remediation strategy across publishers, ad-networks, and advertisers. It introduces an automated pipeline to identify dark pools using static and dynamic analyses and executes a nine-month, multi-round notification campaign with treatments delivered by academics and an activist organization, CheckMyAds. Using propensity-matched difference-in-differences, it finds that notifications reduce dark pooling vulnerabilities across all stakeholder groups, with ad-networks showing the strongest remediation and activists performing comparably to academics, while publishers are comparatively less responsive. The work demonstrates the feasibility and value of multi-stakeholder vulnerability notifications in ad-tech, providing a template for interventions in other complex supply chains.

Abstract

Online advertising relies on a complex and opaque supply chain that involves multiple stakeholders, including advertisers, publishers, and ad-networks, each with distinct and sometimes conflicting incentives. Recent research has demonstrated the existence of ad-tech supply chain vulnerabilities such as dark pooling, where low-quality publishers bundle their ad inventory with higher-quality ones to mislead advertisers. We investigate the effectiveness of vulnerability notification campaigns aimed at mitigating dark pooling. Prior research on vulnerability notifications has primarily focused on single-stakeholder scenarios, and it is unclear whether vulnerability notifications can be effective in the multi-stakeholder ad-tech supply chain. We implement an automated vulnerability notification pipeline to systematically evaluate the responsiveness of various stakeholders, including publishers, ad-networks, and advertisers to vulnerability notifications by academics and activists. Our nine-month long multi-stakeholder notification study shows that notifications are an effective method for reducing dark pooling vulnerabilities in the online advertising ecosystem, especially when targeted towards ad-networks. Further, the sender reputation does not impact responses to notifications from activists and academics in a statistically different way. In addition to being the first notification study targeting the online advertising ecosystem, we are also the first to study multi-stakeholder context in vulnerability notifications.

Turning the Tide on Dark Pools? Towards Multi-Stakeholder Vulnerability Notifications in the Ad-Tech Supply Chain

TL;DR

This paper investigates dark pooling in the online advertising supply chain and tests vulnerability notifications as a remediation strategy across publishers, ad-networks, and advertisers. It introduces an automated pipeline to identify dark pools using static and dynamic analyses and executes a nine-month, multi-round notification campaign with treatments delivered by academics and an activist organization, CheckMyAds. Using propensity-matched difference-in-differences, it finds that notifications reduce dark pooling vulnerabilities across all stakeholder groups, with ad-networks showing the strongest remediation and activists performing comparably to academics, while publishers are comparatively less responsive. The work demonstrates the feasibility and value of multi-stakeholder vulnerability notifications in ad-tech, providing a template for interventions in other complex supply chains.

Abstract

Online advertising relies on a complex and opaque supply chain that involves multiple stakeholders, including advertisers, publishers, and ad-networks, each with distinct and sometimes conflicting incentives. Recent research has demonstrated the existence of ad-tech supply chain vulnerabilities such as dark pooling, where low-quality publishers bundle their ad inventory with higher-quality ones to mislead advertisers. We investigate the effectiveness of vulnerability notification campaigns aimed at mitigating dark pooling. Prior research on vulnerability notifications has primarily focused on single-stakeholder scenarios, and it is unclear whether vulnerability notifications can be effective in the multi-stakeholder ad-tech supply chain. We implement an automated vulnerability notification pipeline to systematically evaluate the responsiveness of various stakeholders, including publishers, ad-networks, and advertisers to vulnerability notifications by academics and activists. Our nine-month long multi-stakeholder notification study shows that notifications are an effective method for reducing dark pooling vulnerabilities in the online advertising ecosystem, especially when targeted towards ad-networks. Further, the sender reputation does not impact responses to notifications from activists and academics in a statistically different way. In addition to being the first notification study targeting the online advertising ecosystem, we are also the first to study multi-stakeholder context in vulnerability notifications.
Paper Structure (20 sections, 13 figures, 4 tables)

This paper contains 20 sections, 13 figures, 4 tables.

Figures (13)

  • Figure 1: Stakeholders in the ad-tech supply chain
  • Figure 2: Our threat model representing ad-tech supply chain vulnerability of dark pooling.
  • Figure 3: An overview of the timeline of the the notification campaign.
  • Figure 4: An illustration of the measured remediation metrics before and after notifications in different rounds to different stakeholders. The difference-in-differences is computed from these metrics as $\Delta_{(t,c)} = (t_{post} - c_{post}) - (t_{pre} - c_{pre})$ for each ad-tech entity.
  • Figure 5: Approaches to resolution
  • ...and 8 more figures