Space-Time Continuous PDE Forecasting using Equivariant Neural Fields
David M. Knigge, David R. Wessels, Riccardo Valperga, Samuele Papa, Jan-Jakob Sonke, Efstratios Gavves, Erik J. Bekkers
TL;DR
This work tackles data-driven forecasting of continuous PDE dynamics from irregular, sparse observations across diverse geometries. It introduces a space-time continuous framework that preserves known PDE symmetries by using Equivariant Neural Fields (ENFs) and a group-equivariant neural ODE to evolve latent representations, with meta-learning speeding up initialization of latent states. The key contributions are extending ENFs to operate under symmetries beyond SE(n), enforcing equivariance in both latent dynamics and decoding, and demonstrating improved generalization, data efficiency, and robustness across plane, torus, sphere, and ball geometries. The approach provides grid-agnostic, symmetry-informed PDE forecasting with strong performance advantages over prior NeF-based methods, particularly in non-grid and long-horizon settings relevant to geophysical and fluid-dynamics applications.
Abstract
Recently, Conditional Neural Fields (NeFs) have emerged as a powerful modelling paradigm for PDEs, by learning solutions as flows in the latent space of the Conditional NeF. Although benefiting from favourable properties of NeFs such as grid-agnosticity and space-time-continuous dynamics modelling, this approach limits the ability to impose known constraints of the PDE on the solutions -- e.g. symmetries or boundary conditions -- in favour of modelling flexibility. Instead, we propose a space-time continuous NeF-based solving framework that - by preserving geometric information in the latent space - respects known symmetries of the PDE. We show that modelling solutions as flows of pointclouds over the group of interest $G$ improves generalization and data-efficiency. We validated that our framework readily generalizes to unseen spatial and temporal locations, as well as geometric transformations of the initial conditions - where other NeF-based PDE forecasting methods fail - and improve over baselines in a number of challenging geometries.
