Direct Preference Optimization for Suppressing Hallucinated Prior Exams in Radiology Report Generation
Oishi Banerjee, Hong-Yu Zhou, Subathra Adithan, Stephen Kwak, Kay Wu, Pranav Rajpurkar
TL;DR
This work tackles hallucinations in radiology report generation by applying Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to suppress references to prior exams in chest X-ray reports. It introduces standard and weighted DPO losses, constructs a GPT-4–edited MIMIC-CXR dataset to enable targeted behavior suppression, and demonstrates that DPO can reduce references to prior exams by about 3.2x–4.8x while preserving clinical accuracy. The study provides a first medical VLM application of DPO, highlighting data- and compute-efficient benefits and offering practical guidance for deploying alignment techniques in radiology. The findings suggest that carefully weighted DPO can mitigate harmful model behaviors without sacrificing essential clinical information, potentially reducing radiologist workload and patient risk.
Abstract
Recent advances in generative vision-language models (VLMs) have exciting potential implications for AI in radiology, yet VLMs are also known to produce hallucinations, nonsensical text, and other unwanted behaviors that can waste clinicians' time and cause patient harm. Drawing on recent work on direct preference optimization (DPO), we propose a simple method for modifying the behavior of pretrained VLMs performing radiology report generation by suppressing unwanted types of generations. We apply our method to the prevention of hallucinations of prior exams, addressing a long-established problem behavior in models performing chest X-ray report generation. Across our experiments, we find that DPO fine-tuning achieves a 3.2-4.8x reduction in lines hallucinating prior exams while maintaining model performance on clinical accuracy metrics. Our work is, to the best of our knowledge, the first work to apply DPO to medical VLMs, providing a data- and compute- efficient way to suppress problem behaviors while maintaining overall clinical accuracy.
