Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Hulls of Projective Reed-Muller Codes

Nathan Kaplan, Jon-Lark Kim

TL;DR

This paper analyzes the hulls of projective Reed-Muller codes $C_{n,k}^q$ over finite fields by combining Sørensen's duality results with a direct linear-algebraic approach to hulls. It provides complete criteria for when such codes are self-dual, self-orthogonal, or LCD, and proves that for sufficiently large $q$, the hull dimension satisfies $\dim(Hull(C_{n,k}^q))=\dim(C_{n,k}^q)-1$, along with additional hull-dimension formulas across broader parameter ranges. A key outcome is a new, direct proof of a 2024 result of Ruano and San-José for the projective plane, with extensions to higher dimensions. The work has implications for quantum codes via hull-related parameters and suggests directions for hull-variation problems and future generalizations.

Abstract

Projective Reed-Muller codes are constructed from the family of projective hypersurfaces of a fixed degree over a finite field $\F_q$. We consider the relationship between projective Reed-Muller codes and their duals. We determine when these codes are self-dual, when they are self-orthogonal, and when they are LCD. We then show that when $q$ is sufficiently large, the dimension of the hull of a projective Reed-Muller code is 1 less than the dimension of the code. We determine the dimension of the hull for a wider range of parameters and describe how this leads to a new proof of a recent result of Ruano and San José (2024).

Hulls of Projective Reed-Muller Codes

TL;DR

This paper analyzes the hulls of projective Reed-Muller codes over finite fields by combining Sørensen's duality results with a direct linear-algebraic approach to hulls. It provides complete criteria for when such codes are self-dual, self-orthogonal, or LCD, and proves that for sufficiently large , the hull dimension satisfies , along with additional hull-dimension formulas across broader parameter ranges. A key outcome is a new, direct proof of a 2024 result of Ruano and San-José for the projective plane, with extensions to higher dimensions. The work has implications for quantum codes via hull-related parameters and suggests directions for hull-variation problems and future generalizations.

Abstract

Projective Reed-Muller codes are constructed from the family of projective hypersurfaces of a fixed degree over a finite field . We consider the relationship between projective Reed-Muller codes and their duals. We determine when these codes are self-dual, when they are self-orthogonal, and when they are LCD. We then show that when is sufficiently large, the dimension of the hull of a projective Reed-Muller code is 1 less than the dimension of the code. We determine the dimension of the hull for a wider range of parameters and describe how this leads to a new proof of a recent result of Ruano and San José (2024).
Paper Structure (8 sections, 17 theorems, 26 equations)

This paper contains 8 sections, 17 theorems, 26 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

(Lac2) Assume that $1 \le k < q$. Then the code $C_{n,k}^q$ has parameters length $N=\frac{q^{n+1}-1}{q-1}$, dimension $K=\binom{n+k}{k}$, distance $D=(q-k+1)q^{n-1}$.

Theorems & Definitions (33)

  • Lemma 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3
  • Proposition 2.4
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.5
  • Proposition 2.6
  • Theorem 2.7
  • Remark 2.8
  • Theorem 2.9
  • ...and 23 more