Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the Lindelöf Hypothesis for the Riemann Zeta function and Piltz divisor problem

Lahoucine Elaissaoui

TL;DR

The paper analyzes the Lindelöf Hypothesis through a Fourier-Laguerre expansion of $\zeta^k(s)$ in the half-plane $\sigma>\tfrac{1}{2}$, showing that $\zeta^k(s)$ admits a convergent expansion $\zeta^k(s)=\sum_{n \ge -k} (-1)^n \ell_{n,k} \left(\frac{s-1}{s}\right)^n$ and that the Lindelöf Hypothesis is equivalent to the square-summability of $\ell_{n,k}$ (equivalently $h_k \in H^2(\mathbb{D})$). The coefficients $\ell_{n,k}$ are explicitly expressed in terms of the auxiliary quantities $\lambda_{j,k}$ via a binomial transform, enabling growth bounds $\ell_{n,k}=O(n^{(k-2)/2+\varepsilon})$ and a detailed structural link to the Stieltjes constants. The second part extends these ideas to the Piltz divisor problem, linking the error term $\Delta_k(x)$ with Laguerre expansions, Hardy-space properties, Poisson kernels, and Mellin transforms, and providing equivalent $L^2$-type criteria for Lindelöf through Abel summability and related transforms. Collectively, the work offers a novel analytic framework connecting zeta-values in the critical strip, divisor problems, and orthogonal expansions, with implications for verifying or refuting the Lindelöf Hypothesis through harmonic analysis on $\mathbb{D}$ and $\mathbb{R}_+$. The results reveal deep connections between $\Delta_k$, Fourier coefficients of $\zeta^k$, and transform-based representations that could inform future approaches to zeta-growth in the critical strip.

Abstract

In order to well understand the behaviour of the Riemann zeta function inside the critical strip, we show; among other things, the Fourier expansion of the $ζ^k(s)$ ($k \in \mathbb{N}$) in the half-plane $\Re s > 1/2$ and we deduce a necessary and sufficient condition for the truth of the Lindelöf Hypothesis. Moreover, if $Δ_k$denotes the error term in the Piltz divisor problem then for almost all $x\geq 1$ and any given $k \in \mathbb{N}$ we have $$Δ_k(x) = \lim_{ρ\to 1^-}\sum_{n=0}^{+\infty}(-1)^n\ell_{n,k}L_n\left(\log(x)\right)ρ^n $$ where $(\ell_{n,k})_{n}$ and $L_n$ denote, respectively, the Fourier coefficients of $ζ^k(s)$ and Laguerre polynomials.

On the Lindelöf Hypothesis for the Riemann Zeta function and Piltz divisor problem

TL;DR

The paper analyzes the Lindelöf Hypothesis through a Fourier-Laguerre expansion of in the half-plane , showing that admits a convergent expansion and that the Lindelöf Hypothesis is equivalent to the square-summability of (equivalently ). The coefficients are explicitly expressed in terms of the auxiliary quantities via a binomial transform, enabling growth bounds and a detailed structural link to the Stieltjes constants. The second part extends these ideas to the Piltz divisor problem, linking the error term with Laguerre expansions, Hardy-space properties, Poisson kernels, and Mellin transforms, and providing equivalent -type criteria for Lindelöf through Abel summability and related transforms. Collectively, the work offers a novel analytic framework connecting zeta-values in the critical strip, divisor problems, and orthogonal expansions, with implications for verifying or refuting the Lindelöf Hypothesis through harmonic analysis on and . The results reveal deep connections between , Fourier coefficients of , and transform-based representations that could inform future approaches to zeta-growth in the critical strip.

Abstract

In order to well understand the behaviour of the Riemann zeta function inside the critical strip, we show; among other things, the Fourier expansion of the () in the half-plane and we deduce a necessary and sufficient condition for the truth of the Lindelöf Hypothesis. Moreover, if denotes the error term in the Piltz divisor problem then for almost all and any given we have where and denote, respectively, the Fourier coefficients of and Laguerre polynomials.
Paper Structure (6 sections, 6 theorems, 91 equations)

This paper contains 6 sections, 6 theorems, 91 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

For any given $k \in \mathbb{N}$ and for all complex number $s=\sigma + it \neq 1$ in the half-plane $\sigma > 1/2,$ we have where

Theorems & Definitions (10)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Corollary 1.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Proposition 2.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.3
  • proof