Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Mobility Equity Metric for Multi-Modal Intelligent Transportation Systems

Heeseung Bang, Aditya Dave, Filippos N. Tzortzoglou, Andreas A. Malikopoulos

TL;DR

The paper addresses equitable mobility in multi-modal intelligent transportation systems by introducing Mobility Equity Metric (MEM) and Mobility Index (MI), where MI at node $i$ is defined as $\varepsilon_i = \sum_{m\in\mathcal{M}} e^{-\kappa_i c_m} \cdot \left\{ \sum_{s\in\mathcal{S}} \beta^s \sigma_{i,m}^s(\tau_m) \right\}$. MEM uses a population-weighted Gini-based dispersion across origins to quantify how evenly MI is distributed, enabling cross-network comparisons. A control framework is developed where a system planner routes compliant public-transit vehicles to maximize MEM while accounting for non-compliant private vehicles via a cognitive-hierarchy model and a BPR latency function $t^{ij}(x^{ij}+q^{ij})=t^{ij}_0\left(1+0.15\left(\dfrac{x^{ij}+q^{ij}}{\gamma^{ij}}\right)^4\right)$. The planner optimizes mode weights $w_m$ under a constraint on travel-time disparity $\delta^{pv}(w)\leq\gamma$, and non-compliant drivers solve level-0 to level-2 shortest-time routing problems. Numerical simulations on a 16-node grid with 15 trips demonstrate how MEM, transit share, and compliance interact to affect network performance, illustrating the trade-offs between equity and efficiency in routing decisions. Overall, the framework provides a pathway to design MEM-aware routing in real-world multi-modal ITS, with implications for policy and planning under varying adoption and compliance scenarios.

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a metric to evaluate the equity in mobility and a routing framework to enhance the metric within multi-modal intelligent transportation systems. The mobility equity metric (MEM) simultaneously accounts for service accessibility and transportation costs to quantify the equity and fairness in a transportation network. Finally, we develop a system planner integrated with MEM that aims to distribute travel demand for the transportation network, resulting in a socially optimal mobility system. Our framework results in a transportation network that is efficient in terms of travel time, improves accessibility, and ensures equity in transportation.

A Mobility Equity Metric for Multi-Modal Intelligent Transportation Systems

TL;DR

The paper addresses equitable mobility in multi-modal intelligent transportation systems by introducing Mobility Equity Metric (MEM) and Mobility Index (MI), where MI at node is defined as . MEM uses a population-weighted Gini-based dispersion across origins to quantify how evenly MI is distributed, enabling cross-network comparisons. A control framework is developed where a system planner routes compliant public-transit vehicles to maximize MEM while accounting for non-compliant private vehicles via a cognitive-hierarchy model and a BPR latency function . The planner optimizes mode weights under a constraint on travel-time disparity , and non-compliant drivers solve level-0 to level-2 shortest-time routing problems. Numerical simulations on a 16-node grid with 15 trips demonstrate how MEM, transit share, and compliance interact to affect network performance, illustrating the trade-offs between equity and efficiency in routing decisions. Overall, the framework provides a pathway to design MEM-aware routing in real-world multi-modal ITS, with implications for policy and planning under varying adoption and compliance scenarios.

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a metric to evaluate the equity in mobility and a routing framework to enhance the metric within multi-modal intelligent transportation systems. The mobility equity metric (MEM) simultaneously accounts for service accessibility and transportation costs to quantify the equity and fairness in a transportation network. Finally, we develop a system planner integrated with MEM that aims to distribute travel demand for the transportation network, resulting in a socially optimal mobility system. Our framework results in a transportation network that is efficient in terms of travel time, improves accessibility, and ensures equity in transportation.
Paper Structure (7 sections, 6 equations, 7 figures)

This paper contains 7 sections, 6 equations, 7 figures.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Isochrone of different transportation modes at Ithaca, NY, USA.
  • Figure 2: Illustration of accessible services within the isochrone for each mode of transportation: (a) walking, (b) bicycle, (c) public transit, (d) driving.
  • Figure 3: Travel-time difference between the first and the second routing iterations for different non-compliance rates with $50\%$ of public transportation and a priority for public transportation of $70\%$.
  • Figure 4: Travel time per edge for different ratios of public transportation.
  • Figure 5: Travel time per edge for different ratios of non-compliance rate.
  • ...and 2 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (6)

  • Definition 1
  • Definition 2
  • Remark 1
  • Remark 2
  • Remark 3
  • Remark 4