Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Pure Exploration for Constrained Best Mixed Arm Identification with a Fixed Budget

Dengwang Tang, Rahul Jain, Ashutosh Nayyar, Pierluigi Nuzzo

TL;DR

This work addresses constrained best mixed arm identification (CBMAI) under a fixed budget, where the optimal decision may be a randomized mix of arms due to multiple unknown cost constraints. It introduces the Score Function-based Successive Reject (SFSR) algorithm, which integrates a successive-reject framework with an intersection-value score derived from linear programming to identify the optimal support of the mixed arm; a variant SFSR-L using a dual LP (Lagrangian) score is also proposed. The authors prove instance-dependent, exponential decay bounds on the misidentification probability and establish a matching information-theoretic lower bound, with empirical results showing strong performance on both average and hard instances. This work enables efficient, pure-exploration identification of optimal mixed arms under unknown reward and cost structures, with potential impact on multi-objective decision problems in recommender systems and AI safety.

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the constrained best mixed arm identification (CBMAI) problem with a fixed budget. This is a pure exploration problem in a stochastic finite armed bandit model. Each arm is associated with a reward and multiple types of costs from unknown distributions. Unlike the unconstrained best arm identification problem, the optimal solution for the CBMAI problem may be a randomized mixture of multiple arms. The goal thus is to find the best mixed arm that maximizes the expected reward subject to constraints on the expected costs with a given learning budget $N$. We propose a novel, parameter-free algorithm, called the Score Function-based Successive Reject (SFSR) algorithm, that combines the classical successive reject framework with a novel score-function-based rejection criteria based on linear programming theory to identify the optimal support. We provide a theoretical upper bound on the mis-identification (of the the support of the best mixed arm) probability and show that it decays exponentially in the budget $N$ and some constants that characterize the hardness of the problem instance. We also develop an information theoretic lower bound on the error probability that shows that these constants appropriately characterize the problem difficulty. We validate this empirically on a number of average and hard instances.

Pure Exploration for Constrained Best Mixed Arm Identification with a Fixed Budget

TL;DR

This work addresses constrained best mixed arm identification (CBMAI) under a fixed budget, where the optimal decision may be a randomized mix of arms due to multiple unknown cost constraints. It introduces the Score Function-based Successive Reject (SFSR) algorithm, which integrates a successive-reject framework with an intersection-value score derived from linear programming to identify the optimal support of the mixed arm; a variant SFSR-L using a dual LP (Lagrangian) score is also proposed. The authors prove instance-dependent, exponential decay bounds on the misidentification probability and establish a matching information-theoretic lower bound, with empirical results showing strong performance on both average and hard instances. This work enables efficient, pure-exploration identification of optimal mixed arms under unknown reward and cost structures, with potential impact on multi-objective decision problems in recommender systems and AI safety.

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the constrained best mixed arm identification (CBMAI) problem with a fixed budget. This is a pure exploration problem in a stochastic finite armed bandit model. Each arm is associated with a reward and multiple types of costs from unknown distributions. Unlike the unconstrained best arm identification problem, the optimal solution for the CBMAI problem may be a randomized mixture of multiple arms. The goal thus is to find the best mixed arm that maximizes the expected reward subject to constraints on the expected costs with a given learning budget . We propose a novel, parameter-free algorithm, called the Score Function-based Successive Reject (SFSR) algorithm, that combines the classical successive reject framework with a novel score-function-based rejection criteria based on linear programming theory to identify the optimal support. We provide a theoretical upper bound on the mis-identification (of the the support of the best mixed arm) probability and show that it decays exponentially in the budget and some constants that characterize the hardness of the problem instance. We also develop an information theoretic lower bound on the error probability that shows that these constants appropriately characterize the problem difficulty. We validate this empirically on a number of average and hard instances.
Paper Structure (19 sections, 5 theorems, 40 equations, 5 figures, 1 table, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 19 sections, 5 theorems, 40 equations, 5 figures, 1 table, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Proposition 1

Under Algorithm algo:ivsr, the number of total arm pulls never exceeds $N$.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Intersection value scores for a 5-arm, 1-constraint instance
  • Figure 2: Top: Three 16-arm instances. Arms in the optimal support are labeled with green triangles. Bottom: Empirical results for three algorithms under varying budgets. 95% confidence intervals are indicated and tight.
  • Figure 3: Top: Three hard 16-arm instances. Arms in the optimal support are labeled with green triangles. Bottom: Empirical results for three algorithms under varying budgets. 95% confidence intervals are indicated and tight.
  • Figure 4: Illustration of SFSR-L in a 1-constraint instance. Left: True mean reward and cost. Right: Empirical means after the first episode. Despite that the empirical means do not deviate from the the true mean by too much, arm 1 (a member of the optimal support) ends up having the lowest empirical Lagrangian reward, and is eliminated as a result.
  • Figure 5: Simulation results for 6 instances with $L=2$ under varying budget. 95% confidence intervals are indicated and tight.

Theorems & Definitions (13)

  • Remark 1
  • Definition 1: BFS
  • Remark 2
  • Proposition 1
  • Remark 3
  • Proposition 2
  • Theorem 1
  • proof : Proof Sketch
  • Remark 4
  • Definition 2: Consistency barrier2023best
  • ...and 3 more