Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Topological Spherical T-duality -- Dimension change from higher degree $H$-flux

Gil R. Cavalcanti, Bart Heemskerk, Bernardo Uribe

TL;DR

This work generalizes topological spherical T-duality to oriented $S^{2n-1}$-bundles equipped with closed odd fluxes of arbitrary degree, establishing the existence of T-duals when the fiber-integrated flux is integral and proving isomorphisms of twisted cohomology between dual spaces. It develops a higher geometric framework by introducing an extended (higher) Courant algebroid $C_\psi$ on the base and shows that spherical T-duality induces an isomorphism $\mathcal{T}_F$ between extended Courant algebroids, thereby realizing geometric spherical duality. A corresponding Fourier–Mukai-type interpretation yields isomorphisms of twisted K-theories for unimodular dual pairs, linking cohomological and K-theoretic aspects of the duality. The paper also provides concrete examples and outlines an extensive outlook on connections to exceptional generalized geometry and potential physical implications of dimension-changing dualities.

Abstract

Topological Spherical T-duality was introduced by Bouwknegt, Evslin and Mathai in [BEM15] as an extension of topological T-duality from $S^1$-bundles to $\mathrm{SU}(2)$-bundles endowed with closed 7-forms. This notion was further extended to sphere bundles by Lind, Sati and Westerland [LSW16] as a duality between $S^{2n-1}$-bundles endowed with closed $(4n-1)$-forms. We generalise this relation one step further and define T-duality for $S^{2n-1}$-bundles endowed with closed odd forms of arbitrary degree. The degree of the form determines the dimension of the fibers of the dual spaces. We show that $T$-duals exist and, as in the previous cases, $T$-dual spaces have isomorphic twisted cohomology. We finish by introducing a version of Courant algebroids which is compatible with spherical T-duality.

Topological Spherical T-duality -- Dimension change from higher degree $H$-flux

TL;DR

This work generalizes topological spherical T-duality to oriented -bundles equipped with closed odd fluxes of arbitrary degree, establishing the existence of T-duals when the fiber-integrated flux is integral and proving isomorphisms of twisted cohomology between dual spaces. It develops a higher geometric framework by introducing an extended (higher) Courant algebroid on the base and shows that spherical T-duality induces an isomorphism between extended Courant algebroids, thereby realizing geometric spherical duality. A corresponding Fourier–Mukai-type interpretation yields isomorphisms of twisted K-theories for unimodular dual pairs, linking cohomological and K-theoretic aspects of the duality. The paper also provides concrete examples and outlines an extensive outlook on connections to exceptional generalized geometry and potential physical implications of dimension-changing dualities.

Abstract

Topological Spherical T-duality was introduced by Bouwknegt, Evslin and Mathai in [BEM15] as an extension of topological T-duality from -bundles to -bundles endowed with closed 7-forms. This notion was further extended to sphere bundles by Lind, Sati and Westerland [LSW16] as a duality between -bundles endowed with closed -forms. We generalise this relation one step further and define T-duality for -bundles endowed with closed odd forms of arbitrary degree. The degree of the form determines the dimension of the fibers of the dual spaces. We show that -duals exist and, as in the previous cases, -dual spaces have isomorphic twisted cohomology. We finish by introducing a version of Courant algebroids which is compatible with spherical T-duality.
Paper Structure (12 sections, 17 theorems, 66 equations)

This paper contains 12 sections, 17 theorems, 66 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.2

Given a T-dual pair $(E,H)$ and $(\hat{E},\hat{H})$ over a manifold $M$, the function $\pi_* \circ p_*(F)\colon M \to \text{${\mathbb R}$}$ is constant and nonvanishing.

Theorems & Definitions (45)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • Definition 3.1
  • Lemma 3.2: Bott--Tu bott-tu, pg 118-119
  • Definition 3.3
  • ...and 35 more