GameVLM: A Decision-making Framework for Robotic Task Planning Based on Visual Language Models and Zero-sum Games
Aoran Mei, Jianhua Wang, Guo-Niu Zhu, Zhongxue Gan
TL;DR
This work tackles robotic task planning with visual-language models by mitigating hallucinations and semantic complexity through a multi-agent framework called GameVLM. It integrates two GPT-4V-based decision agents, an expert evaluator, and a real-time open-vocabulary detector (YOLO-World) within a zero-sum game that rewards consistency and accuracy through a Q&A exchange. Experimental results on real robots show an average success rate of 83.3% across varied tasks, with particular strength in imitation and object stacking but weaker performance in predicting future actions. The approach advances robust, multimodal reasoning for robotic planning and demonstrates practical gains in dynamic, real-world environments, while highlighting areas for improvement in long-horizon prediction and planning.
Abstract
With their prominent scene understanding and reasoning capabilities, pre-trained visual-language models (VLMs) such as GPT-4V have attracted increasing attention in robotic task planning. Compared with traditional task planning strategies, VLMs are strong in multimodal information parsing and code generation and show remarkable efficiency. Although VLMs demonstrate great potential in robotic task planning, they suffer from challenges like hallucination, semantic complexity, and limited context. To handle such issues, this paper proposes a multi-agent framework, i.e., GameVLM, to enhance the decision-making process in robotic task planning. In this study, VLM-based decision and expert agents are presented to conduct the task planning. Specifically, decision agents are used to plan the task, and the expert agent is employed to evaluate these task plans. Zero-sum game theory is introduced to resolve inconsistencies among different agents and determine the optimal solution. Experimental results on real robots demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework, with an average success rate of 83.3%.
