Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Gaussian Measures Conditioned on Nonlinear Observations: Consistency, MAP Estimators, and Simulation

Yifan Chen, Bamdad Hosseini, Houman Owhadi, Andrew M Stuart

TL;DR

This work studies conditioning a Gaussian measure on nonlinear observations $F(\bm{\phi}(\xi))$, establishing that the posterior $\mu^{\mathbf y}_\beta$ decomposes into a Gaussian infinite-dimensional part and a finite-dimensional non-Gaussian component. It proves convergence of $\mu^{\mathbf y}_\beta$ to a conditional measure $\mu^{\mathbf y}_0$ as the noise vanishes and derives a representer-type finite-dimensional characterization for both the posterior and conditional MAP estimators. The authors develop Laplace and Gauss–Newton-type approximations to efficiently sample the non-Gaussian part, enabling scalable uncertainty quantification, and apply the framework to GP-PDE solvers, producing UQ-guided adaptive collocation strategies. The results offer a principled bridge between Bayesian inverse problems and numerical PDE solvers, highlighting practical algorithms that reduce computation to a finite-dimensional non-Gaussian core plus an analytically tractable Gaussian tail. Overall, the paper provides both rigorous structure for conditioned Gaussian measures and practical tools for UQ in nonlinear settings like GP-PDE and nonlinear elliptic/Burgers-type PDEs.

Abstract

The article presents a systematic study of the problem of conditioning a Gaussian random variable $ξ$ on nonlinear observations of the form $F \circ φ(ξ)$ where $φ: \mathcal{X} \to \mathbb{R}^N$ is a bounded linear operator and $F$ is nonlinear. Such problems arise in the context of Bayesian inference and recent machine learning-inspired PDE solvers. We give a representer theorem for the conditioned random variable $ξ\mid F\circ φ(ξ)$, stating that it decomposes as the sum of an infinite-dimensional Gaussian (which is identified analytically) as well as a finite-dimensional non-Gaussian measure. We also introduce a novel notion of the mode of a conditional measure by taking the limit of the natural relaxation of the problem, to which we can apply the existing notion of maximum a posteriori estimators of posterior measures. Finally, we introduce a variant of the Laplace approximation for the efficient simulation of the aforementioned conditioned Gaussian random variables towards uncertainty quantification.

Gaussian Measures Conditioned on Nonlinear Observations: Consistency, MAP Estimators, and Simulation

TL;DR

This work studies conditioning a Gaussian measure on nonlinear observations , establishing that the posterior decomposes into a Gaussian infinite-dimensional part and a finite-dimensional non-Gaussian component. It proves convergence of to a conditional measure as the noise vanishes and derives a representer-type finite-dimensional characterization for both the posterior and conditional MAP estimators. The authors develop Laplace and Gauss–Newton-type approximations to efficiently sample the non-Gaussian part, enabling scalable uncertainty quantification, and apply the framework to GP-PDE solvers, producing UQ-guided adaptive collocation strategies. The results offer a principled bridge between Bayesian inverse problems and numerical PDE solvers, highlighting practical algorithms that reduce computation to a finite-dimensional non-Gaussian core plus an analytically tractable Gaussian tail. Overall, the paper provides both rigorous structure for conditioned Gaussian measures and practical tools for UQ in nonlinear settings like GP-PDE and nonlinear elliptic/Burgers-type PDEs.

Abstract

The article presents a systematic study of the problem of conditioning a Gaussian random variable on nonlinear observations of the form where is a bounded linear operator and is nonlinear. Such problems arise in the context of Bayesian inference and recent machine learning-inspired PDE solvers. We give a representer theorem for the conditioned random variable , stating that it decomposes as the sum of an infinite-dimensional Gaussian (which is identified analytically) as well as a finite-dimensional non-Gaussian measure. We also introduce a novel notion of the mode of a conditional measure by taking the limit of the natural relaxation of the problem, to which we can apply the existing notion of maximum a posteriori estimators of posterior measures. Finally, we introduce a variant of the Laplace approximation for the efficient simulation of the aforementioned conditioned Gaussian random variables towards uncertainty quantification.
Paper Structure (29 sections, 21 theorems, 70 equations, 7 figures, 2 tables, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 29 sections, 21 theorems, 70 equations, 7 figures, 2 tables, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Proposition 1

Consider the above setting and suppose $T: \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y}$ is $\nu$-measurable. Then it holds that:

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Diagram relating small-noise limits of posteriors $\mu^\mathbf y_\beta$ and their MAP estimators $u^\mathbf y_\beta$ to their conditional counterparts $\mu^\mathbf y_0$ and $u^\mathbf y_0$.
  • Figure 2: Numerical results for nonlinear elliptic \ref{['elliptic-PDE']} as described in \ref{['sec:numerics-Demonstration of Consistency']} with $(J,M)=(81,100)$ collocation points. Top row: True solution, error of MCMC mean, and error of the MAP estimator obtained by the GP-PDE methodology. Bottom row: standard deviation field of MCMC samples followed by its difference from the standard deviation fields obtained using the Gauss-Newton and Laplace approximations.
  • Figure 3: Pointwise numerical results for the nonlinear elliptic PDE \ref{['elliptic-PDE']} as described in \ref{['sec:numerics-Demonstration of Consistency']}. Here we compared the conditional distribution of the solution to its various approximations at a single point $[0.6,0.4]$ with (Left) $(M,J)=(16,25)$, (middle) $(M,J)=(49,64)$, and (right) $(M,J) =(81,100)$ collocation points.
  • Figure 4: Comparing posterior standard deviation fields for the nonlinear elliptic PDE \ref{['elliptic-PDE']} as described in \ref{['sec:numerics-Using Posterior for Error Estimates']}. From left to right the panels show the standard deviation fields for increasingly stronger nonlinearities.
  • Figure 5: Truth and the upper and lower error bound obtained by the GP-PDE method, for the slice $\mathbf x_2=0.5$, in the nonlinear elliptic PDE \ref{['elliptic-PDE']} as described in \ref{['sec:numerics-Demonstration of Consistency']}. From left to right the panels show the posterior mean with uncertainty bands for increasingly stronger nonlinearities.
  • ...and 2 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (40)

  • Definition 1
  • Proposition 1
  • Remark 1
  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2
  • proof
  • Remark 2
  • Lemma 2
  • Corollary 1
  • ...and 30 more