Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Accessing non-abelian quotients of the Grothendieck-Teichmueller group via elementary tools

Ivan Bortnovskyi, Vasily A. Dolgushev, Borys Holikov, Vadym Pashkovskyi

TL;DR

This work connects the absolute Galois group $G_{\mathbb{Q}}$ to non-abelian quotients of the profinite Grothendieck–Teichmüller group $\widehat{\mathsf{GT}}$ by exploiting GT‑shadows in the groupoid $\mathsf{GTSh}$. It introduces the dihedral poset $\mathsf{Dih}$ via kernels of explicit maps $\psi_n$ from $\mathrm{PB}_3$ to dihedral groups and proves that each associated finite shadow group $\mathsf{GT}(\mathsf{K}^{(n)})$ is a non-abelian quotient of $G_{\mathbb{Q}}$ for suitable $n$, notably when $n=2^{\alpha}$ with $\alpha\ge2$, where all shadows are arithmetical and the Ihara map is surjective. The results yield an infinite non-abelian profinite quotient $\lim\mathcal{ML}|_{\mathsf{Dih}_2}$ of both $G_{\mathbb{Q}}$ and $\widehat{\mathsf{GT}}$, explicitly realized as a clopen subgroup of $\mathrm{Aff}(\mathbb{Z}_2)$. The Lochak–Schneps conditions provide practical tests for shadow genuineness, and the paper conjectures surjectivity of $G_{\mathbb{Q}}$ onto $\mathsf{GT}(\mathsf{K})$ for every object in the dihedral poset. Overall, the work furnishes concrete, elementary tools to access non-abelian quotients of $\widehat{\mathsf{GT}}$ and highlights a pathway to broader arithmetical GT phenomena.

Abstract

Many challenging questions about the Grothendieck-Teichmueller group, $GT$, are motivated by the fact that this group receives the injective homomorphism (called the Ihara embedding) from the absolute Galois group, $G_Q$, of rational numbers. Although the question about the surjectivity of the Ihara embedding is a very challenging problem, in this paper, we construct a family of finite non-abelian quotients of $GT$ that receive surjective homomorphisms from $G_Q$. We also assemble these finite quotients into an infinite (non-abelian) profinite quotient of $GT$. We prove that the natural homomorphism from $G_Q$ to the resulting profinite group is also surjective. We give an explicit description of this profinite group. To achieve these goals, we used the groupoid $GTSh$ of $GT$-shadows for the gentle version of the Grothendieck-Teichmueller group. This groupoid was introduced in the recent paper by the second author and J. Guynee and the set $Ob(GTSh)$ of objects of $GTSh$ is a poset of certain finite index normal subgroups of the Artin braid group on 3 strands. We introduce a sub-poset $Dih$ of $Ob(GTSh)$ related to the family of dihedral groups and call it the dihedral poset. We show that each element $K$ of $Dih$ is the only object of its connected component in $GTSh$. Using the surjectivity of the cyclotomic character, we prove that, if the order of the dihedral group corresponding to $K$ is a power of 2, then the natural homomorphism from $G_Q$ to the finite group $GTSh(K, K)$ is surjective. We introduce the Lochak-Schneps conditions on morphisms of $GTSh$ and prove that each morphism of $GTSh$ with the target $K$ in $Dih$ satisfies the Lochak-Schneps conditions. Finally, we conjecture that the natural homomorphism from $G_Q$ to the finite group $GTSh(K, K)$ is surjective for every object $K$ of the dihedral poset.

Accessing non-abelian quotients of the Grothendieck-Teichmueller group via elementary tools

TL;DR

This work connects the absolute Galois group to non-abelian quotients of the profinite Grothendieck–Teichmüller group by exploiting GT‑shadows in the groupoid . It introduces the dihedral poset via kernels of explicit maps from to dihedral groups and proves that each associated finite shadow group is a non-abelian quotient of for suitable , notably when with , where all shadows are arithmetical and the Ihara map is surjective. The results yield an infinite non-abelian profinite quotient of both and , explicitly realized as a clopen subgroup of . The Lochak–Schneps conditions provide practical tests for shadow genuineness, and the paper conjectures surjectivity of onto for every object in the dihedral poset. Overall, the work furnishes concrete, elementary tools to access non-abelian quotients of and highlights a pathway to broader arithmetical GT phenomena.

Abstract

Many challenging questions about the Grothendieck-Teichmueller group, , are motivated by the fact that this group receives the injective homomorphism (called the Ihara embedding) from the absolute Galois group, , of rational numbers. Although the question about the surjectivity of the Ihara embedding is a very challenging problem, in this paper, we construct a family of finite non-abelian quotients of that receive surjective homomorphisms from . We also assemble these finite quotients into an infinite (non-abelian) profinite quotient of . We prove that the natural homomorphism from to the resulting profinite group is also surjective. We give an explicit description of this profinite group. To achieve these goals, we used the groupoid of -shadows for the gentle version of the Grothendieck-Teichmueller group. This groupoid was introduced in the recent paper by the second author and J. Guynee and the set of objects of is a poset of certain finite index normal subgroups of the Artin braid group on 3 strands. We introduce a sub-poset of related to the family of dihedral groups and call it the dihedral poset. We show that each element of is the only object of its connected component in . Using the surjectivity of the cyclotomic character, we prove that, if the order of the dihedral group corresponding to is a power of 2, then the natural homomorphism from to the finite group is surjective. We introduce the Lochak-Schneps conditions on morphisms of and prove that each morphism of with the target in satisfies the Lochak-Schneps conditions. Finally, we conjecture that the natural homomorphism from to the finite group is surjective for every object of the dihedral poset.
Paper Structure (16 sections, 20 theorems, 200 equations)

This paper contains 16 sections, 20 theorems, 200 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.6

Let $\theta$ and $\tau$ be the automorphisms of ${\widehat{\mathsf{F}}}_2$ defined in theta and tau, respectively. For every $(\hat{m}, \hat{f}) \in \widehat{\mathsf{GT}}_{gen}$, there exists $\hat{g} \in {\widehat{\mathsf{F}}}_2$ and $\hat{h} \in {\widehat{\mathsf{F}}}_2$ such that Recall that $2\hat{m}+1$ is a unit in the ring $\widehat{\mathbb{Z}}$ and hence its image in ${\mathbb Z}/3{\mathbb

Theorems & Definitions (36)

  • Remark 1.1
  • Remark 1.2
  • Remark 1.3
  • Remark 1.4
  • Remark 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6: Introduction, LochakSchneps-CohomInt
  • Remark 1.7
  • Corollary 1.8
  • Remark 1.9
  • Remark 1.10
  • ...and 26 more