Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Machine Learning-Based Path Loss Modeling with Simplified Features

Jonathan Ethier, Mathieu Chateauvert

TL;DR

This work tackles the challenge of accurate path loss prediction in non-LOS settings by using simple environmental features derived from path profiles. It evaluates three ML architectures—Log-Reg, XGBoost, and FCN—across three feature configurations that incorporate distance $d$, frequency $f$, and obstacle-related depths $o$, $t$, and $c$, with $o = t + c$. Training uses a rigorous city-holdout scheme on the OFCOM drive-test data, and results show that adding obstacle depth substantially lowers RMSE (by ~5 dB) and that FCN with 3–4 features achieves RMSE in the $6$–$8$ dB range, approaching physics-informed baselines while remaining computationally efficient. The study demonstrates that obstacle-depth modeling captures key propagation effects, yielding practical, environment-aware path loss predictions suitable for wireless network planning, and it identifies limitations and avenues for future improvements such as clutter classification and seasonal effects.

Abstract

Propagation modeling is a crucial tool for successful wireless deployments and spectrum planning with the demand for high modeling accuracy continuing to grow. Recognizing that detailed knowledge of the physical environment (terrain and clutter) is essential, we propose a novel approach that uses environmental information for predictions. Instead of relying on complex, detail-intensive models, we explore the use of simplified scalar features involving the total obstruction depth along the direct path from transmitter to receiver. Obstacle depth offers a streamlined, yet surprisingly accurate, method for predicting wireless signal propagation, providing a practical solution for efficient and effective wireless network planning.

Machine Learning-Based Path Loss Modeling with Simplified Features

TL;DR

This work tackles the challenge of accurate path loss prediction in non-LOS settings by using simple environmental features derived from path profiles. It evaluates three ML architectures—Log-Reg, XGBoost, and FCN—across three feature configurations that incorporate distance , frequency , and obstacle-related depths , , and , with . Training uses a rigorous city-holdout scheme on the OFCOM drive-test data, and results show that adding obstacle depth substantially lowers RMSE (by ~5 dB) and that FCN with 3–4 features achieves RMSE in the dB range, approaching physics-informed baselines while remaining computationally efficient. The study demonstrates that obstacle-depth modeling captures key propagation effects, yielding practical, environment-aware path loss predictions suitable for wireless network planning, and it identifies limitations and avenues for future improvements such as clutter classification and seasonal effects.

Abstract

Propagation modeling is a crucial tool for successful wireless deployments and spectrum planning with the demand for high modeling accuracy continuing to grow. Recognizing that detailed knowledge of the physical environment (terrain and clutter) is essential, we propose a novel approach that uses environmental information for predictions. Instead of relying on complex, detail-intensive models, we explore the use of simplified scalar features involving the total obstruction depth along the direct path from transmitter to receiver. Obstacle depth offers a streamlined, yet surprisingly accurate, method for predicting wireless signal propagation, providing a practical solution for efficient and effective wireless network planning.
Paper Structure (14 sections, 4 equations, 4 figures, 3 tables)

This paper contains 14 sections, 4 equations, 4 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Measured Path Loss vs. Distance for the Ofcom OFCOM_DATA Data (FSPL shown for the two frequency extremes)
  • Figure 2: Example path profile extracted using the SAFE tool. Total depth through terrain (724 meters) and total depth through clutter (67 meters + 314 meters = 381 meters) are as shown with total obstacle depth as the sum of the two (724 meters + 381 meters = 1105 meters). Any number of non-contiguous blocks can contribute to the total terrain, clutter and obstacle depths.
  • Figure 3: Histogram of Prediction Errors (London Holdout, FCN)
  • Figure 4: Predicted Obstacle Loss for Various Frequencies and Link Distances (London Holdout FCN-ML model)