Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Space-time stochastic Galerkin boundary elements for acoustic scattering problems

Heiko Gimperlein, Fabian Meyer, Ceyhun Özdemir

TL;DR

This work develops a stochastic space-time boundary-element method for the exterior acoustic wave equation with uncertain sources and boundary data, combining a time-domain boundary integral formulation with a polynomial-chaos (SG) expansion in the stochastic variables. After deriving SD, SN, and acoustic boundary formulations on the scattering boundary, the authors prove stability and convergence of the SG discretizations in space and time and implement a marching-on-in-time scheme that preserves sparsity in the stochastic dimension. The approach is validated in three-space dimensions via model problems and a traffic-noise application, showing spectral convergence in stochastic DOFs and robust behavior with respect to space-time discretization. The results demonstrate the method’s practical potential for uncertainty quantification in engineering acoustics, enabling efficient analysis of mean and variance of acoustic fields in complex, real-world scenarios.

Abstract

Acoustic emission or scattering problems naturally involve uncertainties about the sound sources or boundary conditions. This article initiates the study of time domain boundary elements for such stochastic boundary problems for the acoustic wave equation. We present a space-time stochastic Galerkin boundary element method which is applied to sound-hard, sound-soft and absorbing scatterers. Uncertainties in both the sources and the boundary conditions are considered using a polynomial chaos expansion. The numerical experiments illustrate the performance and convergence of the proposed method in model problems and present an application to a problem from traffic noise.

Space-time stochastic Galerkin boundary elements for acoustic scattering problems

TL;DR

This work develops a stochastic space-time boundary-element method for the exterior acoustic wave equation with uncertain sources and boundary data, combining a time-domain boundary integral formulation with a polynomial-chaos (SG) expansion in the stochastic variables. After deriving SD, SN, and acoustic boundary formulations on the scattering boundary, the authors prove stability and convergence of the SG discretizations in space and time and implement a marching-on-in-time scheme that preserves sparsity in the stochastic dimension. The approach is validated in three-space dimensions via model problems and a traffic-noise application, showing spectral convergence in stochastic DOFs and robust behavior with respect to space-time discretization. The results demonstrate the method’s practical potential for uncertainty quantification in engineering acoustics, enabling efficient analysis of mean and variance of acoustic fields in complex, real-world scenarios.

Abstract

Acoustic emission or scattering problems naturally involve uncertainties about the sound sources or boundary conditions. This article initiates the study of time domain boundary elements for such stochastic boundary problems for the acoustic wave equation. We present a space-time stochastic Galerkin boundary element method which is applied to sound-hard, sound-soft and absorbing scatterers. Uncertainties in both the sources and the boundary conditions are considered using a polynomial chaos expansion. The numerical experiments illustrate the performance and convergence of the proposed method in model problems and present an application to a problem from traffic noise.
Paper Structure (18 sections, 6 theorems, 85 equations, 13 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 18 sections, 6 theorems, 85 equations, 13 figures, 2 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

The single layer and hypersingular operators are continuous for $r \in \mathbb{R}$:

Figures (13)

  • Figure 1: 2nd and 4th spatial refinement level of the sphere Section \ref{['subsec:singlelayerStochastic']}.
  • Figure 2: Plot of a) mean and b) variance of benchmark solution at time $T=2$, refinement level 5 and SG polynomial degree 12. Numerical experiment from Section \ref{['subsec:singlelayerStochastic']}.
  • Figure 3: Plot of relative energy errors for a) a fixed space-time mesh and b) a fixed SG polynomial degree. Numerical experiment from Section \ref{['subsec:singlelayerStochastic']}.
  • Figure 4: 2nd and 4th spatial refinement level of the unit cube Section \ref{['subsec:Acoustic']}.
  • Figure 5: Plot of a) Mean and b) variance of the first component of the solution at time $T=1$, refinement level 5 and SG polynomial degree 4 and $\alpha \sim \mathcal{U}(0.1,1.9)$ on $\Gamma$.
  • ...and 8 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (12)

  • Theorem 2.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.4
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.5
  • proof
  • ...and 2 more