Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Observability of gravitational waves excited by binary stars orbiting around a supermassive black hole by space-based gravitational wave observatory

Kun Meng, Hongsheng Zhang, Xi-Long Fan, Yuan Yong, Fei Du

Abstract

We produce the gravitational waveforms for the extreme mass ratio inspiral systems (EMRIs) of binary stars moving around central supermassive black hole (SBH), or called B-EMRIs. We calculate the external orbits of the binary stars via the commonly used Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) approach, and calculate the internal orbits of the binary stars via Lagrangian approach. To improve accuracy we adopt the quadrupole-octupole expression of gravitational wave (GW) and study the contribution of radiation reaction. Compared to the waveforms of EMRIs, there are higher frequency oscillations superposed on the waveforms of B-EMRIs. We perform frequency spectrum analysis of the GW waveforms, and find that higher frequency signals give their prominency in the waveforms of B-EMRIs. To obtain high precise result for future observation of GWs from space-based detector, we take into account gravito-electromagnetic (GEM) force, and compare the waveforms of B-EMRIs with GEM effects against those of B-EMRIs without GEM effects and against those of EMRIs. The result of mismatch shows that the waveforms of B-EMRIs are credibly distinguishable by the space-based GW detectors when GEM force is considered.

Observability of gravitational waves excited by binary stars orbiting around a supermassive black hole by space-based gravitational wave observatory

Abstract

We produce the gravitational waveforms for the extreme mass ratio inspiral systems (EMRIs) of binary stars moving around central supermassive black hole (SBH), or called B-EMRIs. We calculate the external orbits of the binary stars via the commonly used Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) approach, and calculate the internal orbits of the binary stars via Lagrangian approach. To improve accuracy we adopt the quadrupole-octupole expression of gravitational wave (GW) and study the contribution of radiation reaction. Compared to the waveforms of EMRIs, there are higher frequency oscillations superposed on the waveforms of B-EMRIs. We perform frequency spectrum analysis of the GW waveforms, and find that higher frequency signals give their prominency in the waveforms of B-EMRIs. To obtain high precise result for future observation of GWs from space-based detector, we take into account gravito-electromagnetic (GEM) force, and compare the waveforms of B-EMRIs with GEM effects against those of B-EMRIs without GEM effects and against those of EMRIs. The result of mismatch shows that the waveforms of B-EMRIs are credibly distinguishable by the space-based GW detectors when GEM force is considered.
Paper Structure (7 sections, 49 equations, 15 figures)

This paper contains 7 sections, 49 equations, 15 figures.

Figures (15)

  • Figure 1: A sketch of binary stars orbiting around the central SBH, in which the internal orbit is exaggerated to clearly show the positional relation
  • Figure 2: The first panel displays the orbit of compact object in EMRIs, the second to fourth panels display the orbits of one of the compact objects in B-EMRIs. The lower four panels display the details of the corresponding orbits in the upper four panels in the x-y plane. For the first panel, the mass of the single compact object is set to be $m=18M_{\odot}$, the initial external orbit parameters are set to be $p(0)=10M, e(0)=0.3, \iota(0)=7\pi/9$. For the second to fourth panels, the masses of the compact objects are set to be $m_1=2M_{\odot}, m_2=3M_{\odot}$; $m_1=8M_{\odot}, m_2=10M_{\odot}$ and $m_1=20M_{\odot}, m_2=30M_{\odot}$ respectively. The initial external orbit parameters are set to be $p(0)=10M, e(0)=0.3$ as well, the internal orbit parameters are set to be $\tilde{p}=0.005M, \tilde{e}=0.2$. The rotation parameter of the SBH is set to be $a=0.9M$.
  • Figure 3: $h_{+}$ waveforms of EMRIs and B-EMRIs with different masses. The parameters follow that given in Fig.\ref{['orbit']}, panel by panel.
  • Figure 4: Comparisons between the $h_{+}$ waveforms of EMRIs and B-EMRIs with distinct semi-latus rectum $\tilde{p}$. The binary masses are fixed to be $m_1=8M_{\odot}$ and $m_2=10 M_{\odot}$, and mass of central SBH is $10^6M_{\odot}$. The external orbit parameters are set to be $p(0)=10M, e(0)=0.3, \iota(0)=7\pi/9, a=0.9M$, the internal orbit parameters of the binary stars are set to be $\tilde{e}=0.2, \theta_0=\frac{\pi}{3}$ and $\tilde{p}=0.003M, 0.004M, 0.005M, 0.006M, 0.007M$ respectively.
  • Figure 5: Comparisons of $h_{+}$ waveforms of EMRIs and B-EMRIs by adjusting $\theta_0$. The external orbit parameters are set to be $p(0)=10M, e(0)=0.3, \iota(0)=7\pi/9, a=0.9M$, the internal orbit parameters are set to be $\tilde{p}=0.005M, \tilde{e}=0.2$, and $\theta_0=0, \frac{\pi}{6}, \frac{\pi}{3}, \frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{3\pi}{4}, \pi$ respectivly.
  • ...and 10 more figures