Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Weak and Perron Solutions for Stationary Kramers-Fokker-Planck Equations in Bounded Domains

Benny Avelin, Mingyi Hou

TL;DR

The paper addresses the Dirichlet problem for the stationary Kramers-Fokker-Planck operator $\mathscr{L}$ in bounded domains with rough coefficients, focusing on weak and Perron-Wiener-Brelot (PWB) solutions and the trace issue. It combines variational methods and vanishing-viscosity approximations to establish existence and uniqueness of weak solutions, and shows a renormalized Green's formula holds under a weak trace, enabling a robust comparison principle. Building on these foundations, it develops a full Perron theory in arbitrary bounded domains, proving resolutivity and providing barrier-based boundary regularity results, including that balls and velocity-symmetric domains are regular. The results advance the understanding of boundary value problems for hypoelliptic kinetic equations with rough data, offering tools for further potential-theoretic analysis and applications to metastability and exit-time problems.

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate weak solutions and Perron-Wiener-Brelot solutions to the linear stationary Kramers-Fokker-Planck equation in bounded domains. We establish the existence of weak solutions in product domains by applying the Lions-Lax-Milgram theorem and the vanishing viscosity method. Furthermore, we show that these solutions coincide in well-behaved domains. Building on the existence of weak solutions in product domains, we develop the foundational theory of Perron-Wiener-Brelot solutions in arbitrary bounded domains. Our results rely on recent advancements in the theory of kinetic Fokker-Planck equations with rough coefficients.

Weak and Perron Solutions for Stationary Kramers-Fokker-Planck Equations in Bounded Domains

TL;DR

The paper addresses the Dirichlet problem for the stationary Kramers-Fokker-Planck operator in bounded domains with rough coefficients, focusing on weak and Perron-Wiener-Brelot (PWB) solutions and the trace issue. It combines variational methods and vanishing-viscosity approximations to establish existence and uniqueness of weak solutions, and shows a renormalized Green's formula holds under a weak trace, enabling a robust comparison principle. Building on these foundations, it develops a full Perron theory in arbitrary bounded domains, proving resolutivity and providing barrier-based boundary regularity results, including that balls and velocity-symmetric domains are regular. The results advance the understanding of boundary value problems for hypoelliptic kinetic equations with rough data, offering tools for further potential-theoretic analysis and applications to metastability and exit-time problems.

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate weak solutions and Perron-Wiener-Brelot solutions to the linear stationary Kramers-Fokker-Planck equation in bounded domains. We establish the existence of weak solutions in product domains by applying the Lions-Lax-Milgram theorem and the vanishing viscosity method. Furthermore, we show that these solutions coincide in well-behaved domains. Building on the existence of weak solutions in product domains, we develop the foundational theory of Perron-Wiener-Brelot solutions in arbitrary bounded domains. Our results rely on recent advancements in the theory of kinetic Fokker-Planck equations with rough coefficients.
Paper Structure (24 sections, 31 theorems, 125 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 24 sections, 31 theorems, 125 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Lemma 3.1

Let $\mathcal{D}\subset\mathbb{R}^{2n}$ satisfy assump:D0 where $\partial\mathcal{U}$ is $\mathrm{C}^{1,1}$, then there is a linear operator such that, for $\varphi\in \mathrm{C}^1(\overline{\mathcal{D}})$, $\varphi|_{\partial^v\mathcal{D}} = 0$, we have the following integration by parts formula:

Figures (1)

  • Figure :

Theorems & Definitions (68)

  • Lemma 3.1: Weak trace
  • Remark 3.2
  • Definition 3.3: Weak solution
  • Definition 3.4
  • Theorem 1
  • Definition 3.5
  • Theorem 2
  • Theorem 3: Comparison principle
  • Remark 3.6
  • Definition 3.7
  • ...and 58 more