Quasi-Monte Carlo for Bayesian design of experiment problems governed by parametric PDEs
Vesa Kaarnioja, Claudia Schillings
TL;DR
This work advances Bayesian optimal experimental design for PDE-governed inverse problems by establishing parametric regularity of the expected information gain integrand and rigorously analyzing quasi-Monte Carlo approaches. It develops both full-tensor and sparse-tensor QMC frameworks, deriving dimension-robust convergence rates under suitable regularity and weight assumptions, and demonstrates substantial practical gains through an elliptic PDE test with unknown diffusion coefficients. The combination of inner-outer regularity analysis and CFL-style tail control enables efficient nested integration for $EIG$, with sparse-tensor approaches recovering near-optimal rates in numerical experiments. Overall, the methodology offers a scalable, high-dimensional Bayesian design tool with strong theoretical guarantees and demonstrated applicability to complex PDE-based systems.
Abstract
This paper contributes to the study of optimal experimental design for Bayesian inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs). We derive estimates for the parametric regularity of multivariate double integration problems over high-dimensional parameter and data domains arising in Bayesian optimal design problems. We provide a detailed analysis for these double integration problems using two approaches: a full tensor product and a sparse tensor product combination of quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) cubature rules over the parameter and data domains. Specifically, we show that the latter approach significantly improves the convergence rate, exhibiting performance comparable to that of QMC integration of a single high-dimensional integral. Furthermore, we numerically verify the predicted convergence rates for an elliptic PDE problem with an unknown diffusion coefficient in two spatial dimensions, offering empirical evidence supporting the theoretical results and highlighting practical applicability.
