Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Difference ascent sequences and related combinatorial structures

Yongchun Zang, Robin D. P. Zhou

TL;DR

The paper develops bijective correspondences for generalized $d$-ascent sequences by introducing difference $d$ permutations and difference $d$ posets, each in bijection with $\,\mathcal{A}^d_n$, thereby extending known results for ascent and weak ascent sequences. It provides a recursive construction $oldsymbol{φ}$ that maps difference $d$ permutations to $d$-ascent sequences with $ ext{act}(π) = \text{dasc}(\boldsymbol{φ}(π)) + 1$, and proves that $\,\mathcal{S}^d_n$ corresponds to a bivincular pattern family $\Sigma_{d+3}$, yielding a pattern-avoidance interpretation. A parallel bijection $oldsymbol{ψ}$ links difference $d$ posets to $d$-ascent sequences and aligns $ ext{Act}(P)$ with $\text{dAsc}(\boldsymbol{ψ}(P))$, generalizing the weak- and ordinary-ascent connections to the $d$-setting. Finally, the paper constructs a direct, weight-preserving bijection $ heta$ between matrices with a column restriction and Fishburn matrices, resolving a $D$ukes–Sagan problem and connecting to the existing $\text{mx}$ mappings. Collectively, these results complete the bijective landscape for $d$-ascent sequences across permutations, posets, and matrices, and answer several open questions in the field.

Abstract

Ascent sequences were introduced by Bousquet-Mélou, Claesson, Dukes and Kitaev, and are in bijection with unlabeled $(2+2)$-free posets, Fishburn matrices, permutations avoiding a bivincular pattern of length $3$, and Stoimenow matchings. Analogous results for weak ascent sequences have been obtained by Bényi, Claesson and Dukes. Recently, Dukes and Sagan introduced a more general class of sequences which are called $d$-ascent sequences. They showed that some maps from the weak case can be extended to bijections for general $d$ while the extensions of others continue to be injective but not surjective. The main objective of this paper is to restore these injections to bijections. To be specific, we introduce a class of permutations which we call difference $d$ permutations and a class of factorial posets which we call difference $d$ posets, both of which are shown to be in bijection with $d$-ascent sequences. Moreover, we also give a direct bijection between a class of matrices with a certain column restriction and Fishburn matrices. Our results give answers to several questions posed by Dukes and Sagan.

Difference ascent sequences and related combinatorial structures

TL;DR

The paper develops bijective correspondences for generalized -ascent sequences by introducing difference permutations and difference posets, each in bijection with , thereby extending known results for ascent and weak ascent sequences. It provides a recursive construction that maps difference permutations to -ascent sequences with , and proves that corresponds to a bivincular pattern family , yielding a pattern-avoidance interpretation. A parallel bijection links difference posets to -ascent sequences and aligns with , generalizing the weak- and ordinary-ascent connections to the -setting. Finally, the paper constructs a direct, weight-preserving bijection between matrices with a column restriction and Fishburn matrices, resolving a ukes–Sagan problem and connecting to the existing mappings. Collectively, these results complete the bijective landscape for -ascent sequences across permutations, posets, and matrices, and answer several open questions in the field.

Abstract

Ascent sequences were introduced by Bousquet-Mélou, Claesson, Dukes and Kitaev, and are in bijection with unlabeled -free posets, Fishburn matrices, permutations avoiding a bivincular pattern of length , and Stoimenow matchings. Analogous results for weak ascent sequences have been obtained by Bényi, Claesson and Dukes. Recently, Dukes and Sagan introduced a more general class of sequences which are called -ascent sequences. They showed that some maps from the weak case can be extended to bijections for general while the extensions of others continue to be injective but not surjective. The main objective of this paper is to restore these injections to bijections. To be specific, we introduce a class of permutations which we call difference permutations and a class of factorial posets which we call difference posets, both of which are shown to be in bijection with -ascent sequences. Moreover, we also give a direct bijection between a class of matrices with a certain column restriction and Fishburn matrices. Our results give answers to several questions posed by Dukes and Sagan.
Paper Structure (4 sections, 15 theorems, 22 equations, 4 figures)

This paper contains 4 sections, 15 theorems, 22 equations, 4 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

(BenyiBousquet) For $n \geq 1$, there is a bijection between $\mathcal{A}_n$ and $\mathcal{S}_n(\tau_3)$, and a bijection between $\mathcal{A}^1_n$ and $\mathcal{S}_n(\tau_4)$.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Two factorial posets.
  • Figure 2: A poset in $\mathcal{P}^0_5$ but not in $\mathcal{P}_5(P_{3})$.
  • Figure 3: An example of the bijection $\psi$ between $\mathcal{P}^d_n$ and $\mathcal{A}^d_n$.
  • Figure 4: A matrix of $\mathcal{M}'_{19}$ with its $\mathrm{rmax}$ and $\mathrm{rmin}$ values.

Theorems & Definitions (21)

  • Theorem 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • Theorem 2.4
  • Lemma 2.5
  • Example 2.6
  • Theorem 2.7
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Theorem 3.3
  • Theorem 3.4
  • Lemma 3.5
  • ...and 11 more