Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The Call for Socially Aware Language Technologies

Diyi Yang, Dirk Hovy, David Jurgens, Barbara Plank

TL;DR

The paper argues that current NLP progress, especially with large language models, overlooks social context, leading to biases and unsafe outputs. It proposes a dedicated subfield of socially aware language technologies organized around social factors, interaction, and implication, with concrete design and evaluation considerations. Key contributions include clarifying what counts as social awareness in NLP, differentiating it from related concepts, and outlining necessary shifts in data, tasks, and metrics. This approach aims to produce NLP systems that are more natural, trustworthy, and socially aligned across diverse users and contexts, while promoting cross-disciplinary collaboration and responsible innovation.

Abstract

Language technologies have made enormous progress, especially with the introduction of large language models (LLMs). On traditional tasks such as machine translation and sentiment analysis, these models perform at near-human level. These advances can, however, exacerbate a variety of issues that models have traditionally struggled with, such as bias, evaluation, and risks. In this position paper, we argue that many of these issues share a common core: a lack of awareness of the factors, context, and implications of the social environment in which NLP operates, which we call social awareness. While NLP is getting better at solving the formal linguistic aspects, limited progress has been made in adding the social awareness required for language applications to work in all situations for all users. Integrating social awareness into NLP models will make applications more natural, helpful, and safe, and will open up new possibilities. Thus we argue that substantial challenges remain for NLP to develop social awareness and that we are just at the beginning of a new era for the field.

The Call for Socially Aware Language Technologies

TL;DR

The paper argues that current NLP progress, especially with large language models, overlooks social context, leading to biases and unsafe outputs. It proposes a dedicated subfield of socially aware language technologies organized around social factors, interaction, and implication, with concrete design and evaluation considerations. Key contributions include clarifying what counts as social awareness in NLP, differentiating it from related concepts, and outlining necessary shifts in data, tasks, and metrics. This approach aims to produce NLP systems that are more natural, trustworthy, and socially aligned across diverse users and contexts, while promoting cross-disciplinary collaboration and responsible innovation.

Abstract

Language technologies have made enormous progress, especially with the introduction of large language models (LLMs). On traditional tasks such as machine translation and sentiment analysis, these models perform at near-human level. These advances can, however, exacerbate a variety of issues that models have traditionally struggled with, such as bias, evaluation, and risks. In this position paper, we argue that many of these issues share a common core: a lack of awareness of the factors, context, and implications of the social environment in which NLP operates, which we call social awareness. While NLP is getting better at solving the formal linguistic aspects, limited progress has been made in adding the social awareness required for language applications to work in all situations for all users. Integrating social awareness into NLP models will make applications more natural, helpful, and safe, and will open up new possibilities. Thus we argue that substantial challenges remain for NLP to develop social awareness and that we are just at the beginning of a new era for the field.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 1 figure)

This paper contains 11 sections, 1 figure.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Conceptual structure of socially aware language technologies: social factors, interaction, and implication. This is not an exclusive partition, but one way to understand the scope of social awareness.