Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A deep causal inference model for fully-interpretable travel behaviour analysis

Kimia Kamal, Bilal Farooq

TL;DR

CAROLINA addresses a key gap in travel behaviour analysis by integrating causal inference with deep, interpretable discrete choice models and a generative counterfactual module. It combines a DSCM with ResLogit/Ordinal-ResLogit for interpretable utilities and a Flow-based VAE to learn latent exogenous factors, enabling do-based counterfactual forecasting. Across VR pedestrian, London RP, and synthetic data, CAROLINA yields clearer causal structures, reduced bias in causal estimates, and substantial policy-relevant counterfactual insights (e.g., stress-reduction increasing short-wait outcomes and shorter travel distance boosting active modes). This framework advances practical policy analysis by delivering causally coherent, interpretable predictions and counterfactuals for transportation planning.

Abstract

Transport policy assessment often involves causal questions, yet the causal inference capabilities of traditional travel behavioural models are at best limited. We present the deep CAusal infeRence mOdel for traveL behavIour aNAlysis (CAROLINA), a framework that explicitly models causality in travel behaviour, enhances predictive accuracy, and maintains interpretability by leveraging causal inference, deep learning, and traditional discrete choice modelling. Within this framework, we introduce a Generative Counterfactual model for forecasting human behaviour by adapting the Normalizing Flow method. Through the case studies of virtual reality-based pedestrian crossing behaviour, revealed preference travel behaviour from London, and synthetic data, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed models in uncovering causal relationships, prediction accuracy, and assessing policy interventions. Our results show that intervention mechanisms that can reduce pedestrian stress levels lead to a 38.5% increase in individuals experiencing shorter waiting times. Reducing the travel distances in London results in a 47% increase in sustainable travel modes.

A deep causal inference model for fully-interpretable travel behaviour analysis

TL;DR

CAROLINA addresses a key gap in travel behaviour analysis by integrating causal inference with deep, interpretable discrete choice models and a generative counterfactual module. It combines a DSCM with ResLogit/Ordinal-ResLogit for interpretable utilities and a Flow-based VAE to learn latent exogenous factors, enabling do-based counterfactual forecasting. Across VR pedestrian, London RP, and synthetic data, CAROLINA yields clearer causal structures, reduced bias in causal estimates, and substantial policy-relevant counterfactual insights (e.g., stress-reduction increasing short-wait outcomes and shorter travel distance boosting active modes). This framework advances practical policy analysis by delivering causally coherent, interpretable predictions and counterfactuals for transportation planning.

Abstract

Transport policy assessment often involves causal questions, yet the causal inference capabilities of traditional travel behavioural models are at best limited. We present the deep CAusal infeRence mOdel for traveL behavIour aNAlysis (CAROLINA), a framework that explicitly models causality in travel behaviour, enhances predictive accuracy, and maintains interpretability by leveraging causal inference, deep learning, and traditional discrete choice modelling. Within this framework, we introduce a Generative Counterfactual model for forecasting human behaviour by adapting the Normalizing Flow method. Through the case studies of virtual reality-based pedestrian crossing behaviour, revealed preference travel behaviour from London, and synthetic data, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed models in uncovering causal relationships, prediction accuracy, and assessing policy interventions. Our results show that intervention mechanisms that can reduce pedestrian stress levels lead to a 38.5% increase in individuals experiencing shorter waiting times. Reducing the travel distances in London results in a 47% increase in sustainable travel modes.
Paper Structure (23 sections, 22 equations, 14 figures, 8 tables, 2 algorithms)

This paper contains 23 sections, 22 equations, 14 figures, 8 tables, 2 algorithms.

Figures (14)

  • Figure 1: Three basic structures in a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG)
  • Figure 2: Visualization of Intervention Operations (a): original, (b): hard, (c): soft
  • Figure 3: The architecture of interpertable deep structural causal model in CAROLINA
  • Figure 4: The visualization of latent construct in a DAG
  • Figure 5: The architecture of generative counterfactual model in CAROLINA
  • ...and 9 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (8)

  • Definition 1: Directed Acyclic Graphs
  • Definition 2: Sufficiency
  • Definition 3: Faithfulness
  • Definition 4: Blocking set
  • Definition 5: d-separated
  • Definition 6: Intervention distribution
  • Definition 7: Local Markov property
  • Definition 8: Markov Factorization property