Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Guided Conditional Diffusion Classifier (ConDiff) for Enhanced Prediction of Infection in Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Palawat Busaranuvong, Emmanuel Agu, Deepak Kumar, Shefalika Gautam, Reza Saadati Fard, Bengisu Tulu, Diane Strong

TL;DR

The paper tackles automated infection detection in Diabetic Foot Ulcers from wound images. It introduces ConDiff, a Guided Conditional Diffusion Classifier that synthesizes conditionally guided images via CFG-DDIM and classifies infection by minimizing the $L_2$ distance in a learned embedding space, aided by a Triplet loss to reduce overfitting. On a refined DFU dataset, ConDiff achieves up to $83\%$ accuracy and an $F_1$-score of $0.858$, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines by at least $3\%$, albeit with higher inference time. This work advances generative-discriminative medical image analysis and suggests a path toward more accurate and interpretable infection detection in DFUs, with potential extensions to multi-modal data and other wound types.

Abstract

To detect infected wounds in Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs) from photographs, preventing severe complications and amputations. Methods: This paper proposes the Guided Conditional Diffusion Classifier (ConDiff), a novel deep-learning infection detection model that combines guided image synthesis with a denoising diffusion model and distance-based classification. The process involves (1) generating guided conditional synthetic images by injecting Gaussian noise to a guide image, followed by denoising the noise-perturbed image through a reverse diffusion process, conditioned on infection status and (2) classifying infections based on the minimum Euclidean distance between synthesized images and the original guide image in embedding space. Results: ConDiff demonstrated superior performance with an accuracy of 83% and an F1-score of 0.858, outperforming state-of-the-art models by at least 3%. The use of a triplet loss function reduces overfitting in the distance-based classifier. Conclusions: ConDiff not only enhances diagnostic accuracy for DFU infections but also pioneers the use of generative discriminative models for detailed medical image analysis, offering a promising approach for improving patient outcomes.

Guided Conditional Diffusion Classifier (ConDiff) for Enhanced Prediction of Infection in Diabetic Foot Ulcers

TL;DR

The paper tackles automated infection detection in Diabetic Foot Ulcers from wound images. It introduces ConDiff, a Guided Conditional Diffusion Classifier that synthesizes conditionally guided images via CFG-DDIM and classifies infection by minimizing the distance in a learned embedding space, aided by a Triplet loss to reduce overfitting. On a refined DFU dataset, ConDiff achieves up to accuracy and an -score of , outperforming state-of-the-art baselines by at least , albeit with higher inference time. This work advances generative-discriminative medical image analysis and suggests a path toward more accurate and interpretable infection detection in DFUs, with potential extensions to multi-modal data and other wound types.

Abstract

To detect infected wounds in Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs) from photographs, preventing severe complications and amputations. Methods: This paper proposes the Guided Conditional Diffusion Classifier (ConDiff), a novel deep-learning infection detection model that combines guided image synthesis with a denoising diffusion model and distance-based classification. The process involves (1) generating guided conditional synthetic images by injecting Gaussian noise to a guide image, followed by denoising the noise-perturbed image through a reverse diffusion process, conditioned on infection status and (2) classifying infections based on the minimum Euclidean distance between synthesized images and the original guide image in embedding space. Results: ConDiff demonstrated superior performance with an accuracy of 83% and an F1-score of 0.858, outperforming state-of-the-art models by at least 3%. The use of a triplet loss function reduces overfitting in the distance-based classifier. Conclusions: ConDiff not only enhances diagnostic accuracy for DFU infections but also pioneers the use of generative discriminative models for detailed medical image analysis, offering a promising approach for improving patient outcomes.
Paper Structure (33 sections, 14 equations, 12 figures, 6 tables, 3 algorithms)

This paper contains 33 sections, 14 equations, 12 figures, 6 tables, 3 algorithms.

Figures (12)

  • Figure 1: Natural data augmentation of an original image with three different magnifications.
  • Figure 2: Inference in the ConDiff Classier Framework. Input $x_0$ is perturbed by noise of strength $t_0$. The perturbed input $x_{t_0 T}$ is denoised through a reverse diffusion process to synthesize image $\hat{x}_0^{(y_i)}$ conditioned on label $y_i$. Infection classification is based on the minimum $L_2$ distance between $x_0$ and $\hat{x}_0^{(y_i)}$ in embedding space.
  • Figure 3: Synthesizing conditional DFU images using ConDiff. A guide image $x_0$ is perturbed with Gaussian noises that are then removed progressively using a CFG-DDIM sampling technique (see Algorithm. \ref{['alg_cfg_sampling']}), conditioned on the infection status. This process gradually projects $x_0$ to guided synthetic images of conditions: $\hat{x}_0^{(y_1)}$ and $\hat{x}_0^{(y_2)}$.
  • Figure 4: The learning accuracy trajectories of the ConDiff classifier and best-performing CNN-based (EfficientNet-B0) and ViT-based (EfficientFormer-L1) models, on the train and validation sets.
  • Figure 5: Examples of incorrectly classified DFU images for infection by our ConDiff Classifier.
  • ...and 7 more figures