Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Approximation Schemes for Orienteering and Deadline TSP in Doubling Metrics

Kinter Ren, Mohammad R. Salavatipour

TL;DR

The paper advances the theory of routing with deadlines and profit in geometric-like metrics by delivering the first approximation scheme for deadline TSP on doubling metrics, with running times that depend polylogarithmically on the diameter. It also provides tight results for treewidth-bounded graphs, including exact solutions for k-stroll and P2P orienteering and a $(1+ε)$-approximation for deadline TSP under integer distances, via a tree-decomposition DP. Central to the approach is a hierarchical, probabilistic decomposition of the metric (γ-split-tree) and a structured near-optimal solution P' whose behavior across clusters can be captured by dynamic programming, yielding provable $(1+ε)$ guarantees. The results significantly broaden the tractability frontier for budgeted and deadline-based routing problems in doubling and Euclidean-type metrics, with potential impact on vehicle routing and scheduling in related geometric settings.

Abstract

In this paper we look at $k$-stroll, point-to-point orienteering, as well as the deadline TSP problem on graphs with bounded doubling dimension and bounded treewidth and present approximation schemes for them. Given a weighted graph $G=(V,E)$, start node $s\in V$, distances $d:E\rightarrow \mathbb{Q}^+$ and integer $k$. In the $k$-stroll problem the goal is to find a path starting at $s$ of minimum length that visits at least $k$ vertices. The dual problem to $k$-stroll is the rooted orienteering in which instead of $k$ we are given a budget $B$ and the goal is to find a walk of length at most $B$ starting at $s$ that visits as many vertices as possible. In the P2P orienteering we are given start and end nodes $s,t$ for the path. In the deadline TSP we are given a deadline $D(v)$ for each $v\in V$ and the goal is to find a walk starting at $s$ that visits as many vertices as possible before their deadline. The best approximation for rooted or P2P orienteering is $(2+ε)$-approximation [12] and $O(\log n)$-approximation for deadline TSP [3]. There is no known approximation scheme for deadline TSP for any metric (not even trees). Our main result is the first approximation scheme for deadline TSP on metrics with bounded doubling dimension. To do so we first show if $G$ is a metric with doubling dimension $κ$ and aspect ratio $Δ$, there is a $(1+ε)$-approximation that runs in time $n^{O\left(\left(\logΔ/ε\right)^{2κ+1}\right)}$. We then extend these to obtain an approximation scheme for deadline TSP when the distances and deadlines are integer which runs in time $n^{O\left(\left(\log Δ/ε\right)^{2κ+2}\right)}$. For graphs with treewidth $ω$ we show how to solve $k$-stroll and P2P orienteering exactly in polynomial time and a $(1+ε)$-approximation for deadline TSP in time $n^{O((ω\logΔ/ε)^2)}$.

Approximation Schemes for Orienteering and Deadline TSP in Doubling Metrics

TL;DR

The paper advances the theory of routing with deadlines and profit in geometric-like metrics by delivering the first approximation scheme for deadline TSP on doubling metrics, with running times that depend polylogarithmically on the diameter. It also provides tight results for treewidth-bounded graphs, including exact solutions for k-stroll and P2P orienteering and a -approximation for deadline TSP under integer distances, via a tree-decomposition DP. Central to the approach is a hierarchical, probabilistic decomposition of the metric (γ-split-tree) and a structured near-optimal solution P' whose behavior across clusters can be captured by dynamic programming, yielding provable guarantees. The results significantly broaden the tractability frontier for budgeted and deadline-based routing problems in doubling and Euclidean-type metrics, with potential impact on vehicle routing and scheduling in related geometric settings.

Abstract

In this paper we look at -stroll, point-to-point orienteering, as well as the deadline TSP problem on graphs with bounded doubling dimension and bounded treewidth and present approximation schemes for them. Given a weighted graph , start node , distances and integer . In the -stroll problem the goal is to find a path starting at of minimum length that visits at least vertices. The dual problem to -stroll is the rooted orienteering in which instead of we are given a budget and the goal is to find a walk of length at most starting at that visits as many vertices as possible. In the P2P orienteering we are given start and end nodes for the path. In the deadline TSP we are given a deadline for each and the goal is to find a walk starting at that visits as many vertices as possible before their deadline. The best approximation for rooted or P2P orienteering is -approximation [12] and -approximation for deadline TSP [3]. There is no known approximation scheme for deadline TSP for any metric (not even trees). Our main result is the first approximation scheme for deadline TSP on metrics with bounded doubling dimension. To do so we first show if is a metric with doubling dimension and aspect ratio , there is a -approximation that runs in time . We then extend these to obtain an approximation scheme for deadline TSP when the distances and deadlines are integer which runs in time . For graphs with treewidth we show how to solve -stroll and P2P orienteering exactly in polynomial time and a -approximation for deadline TSP in time .
Paper Structure (13 sections, 16 theorems, 18 equations)

This paper contains 13 sections, 16 theorems, 18 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Given a graph with treewidth $\omega$, there is an exact algorithm with running time is $O(\text{Poly}(n)\cdot \omega^{\omega^2})$ for solving the $k$-stroll or P2P orienteering problem. Furthermore, there is an approximation scheme for deadline TSP on such graphs with integer distances with running

Theorems & Definitions (30)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Theorem 3
  • Theorem 4
  • Definition 1
  • Definition 2: multi-path $k$-stroll
  • Theorem 5: Talwar04
  • Theorem 6
  • Definition 3
  • Lemma 1
  • ...and 20 more