Low-Bandwidth Matrix Multiplication: Faster Algorithms and More General Forms of Sparsity
Chetan Gupta, Janne H. Korhonen, Jan Studený, Jukka Suomela, Hossein Vahidi
TL;DR
This work advances distributed sparse matrix multiplication in the low-bandwidth model by delivering faster algorithms and broadening the sparsity notions considered. The authors introduce a refined triangle-processing approach that reduces rounds to $O(d^{1.867})$ for semirings and $O(d^{1.832})$ for fields, leveraging a novel few-triangles technique and balanced virtual instances. They extend the analysis beyond uniform sparsity to $ extsf{US}$, $ extsf{RS}$, $ extsf{CS}$, $ extsf{BD}$, $ extsf{AS}$, and general matrices, providing a near-complete complexity classification across combinations and achieving $O(d^2 + \log n)$ bounds in many cases. The bounded-degeneracy perspective highlights a practical sparsity model that bridges dense and sparse regimes, with BD subsuming RS/CS and enabling efficient algorithms under structure knowledge. Lower bounds via broadcast, routing, and communication complexity confirm fundamental limits and guide future improvements, including removing support assumptions and tightening gaps in the sparsity-class table.
Abstract
In prior work, Gupta et al. (SPAA 2022) presented a distributed algorithm for multiplying sparse $n \times n$ matrices, using $n$ computers. They assumed that the input matrices are uniformly sparse--there are at most $d$ non-zeros in each row and column--and the task is to compute a uniformly sparse part of the product matrix. The sparsity structure is globally known in advance (this is the supported setting). As input, each computer receives one row of each input matrix, and each computer needs to output one row of the product matrix. In each communication round each computer can send and receive one $O(\log n)$-bit message. Their algorithm solves this task in $O(d^{1.907})$ rounds, while the trivial bound is $O(d^2)$. We improve on the prior work in two dimensions: First, we show that we can solve the same task faster, in only $O(d^{1.832})$ rounds. Second, we explore what happens when matrices are not uniformly sparse. We consider the following alternative notions of sparsity: row-sparse matrices (at most $d$ non-zeros per row), column-sparse matrices, matrices with bounded degeneracy (we can recursively delete a row or column with at most $d$ non-zeros), average-sparse matrices (at most $dn$ non-zeros in total), and general matrices.
