Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Finite element analysis of a spectral problem on curved meshes occurring in diffusion with high order boundary conditions

Fabien Caubet, Joyce Ghantous, Charles Pierre

Abstract

In this work is considered a spectral problem, involving a second order term on the domain boundary: the Laplace-Beltrami operator. A variational formulation is presented, leading to a finite element discretization. For the Laplace-Beltrami operator to make sense on the boundary, the domain is smooth: consequently the computational domain (classically a polygonal domain) will not match the physical one. Thus, the physical domain is discretized using high order curved meshes so as to reduce the \textit{geometric error}. The \textit{lift operator}, which is aimed to transform a function defined on the mesh domain into a function defined on the physical one, is recalled. This \textit{lift} is a key ingredient in estimating errors on eigenvalues and eigenfunctions. A bootstrap method is used to prove the error estimates, which are expressed both in terms of \textit{finite element approximation error} and of \textit{geometric error}, respectively associated to the finite element degree $k\ge 1$ and to the mesh order~$r\ge 1$. Numerical experiments are led on various smooth domains in 2D and 3D, which allow us to validate the presented theoretical results.

Finite element analysis of a spectral problem on curved meshes occurring in diffusion with high order boundary conditions

Abstract

In this work is considered a spectral problem, involving a second order term on the domain boundary: the Laplace-Beltrami operator. A variational formulation is presented, leading to a finite element discretization. For the Laplace-Beltrami operator to make sense on the boundary, the domain is smooth: consequently the computational domain (classically a polygonal domain) will not match the physical one. Thus, the physical domain is discretized using high order curved meshes so as to reduce the \textit{geometric error}. The \textit{lift operator}, which is aimed to transform a function defined on the mesh domain into a function defined on the physical one, is recalled. This \textit{lift} is a key ingredient in estimating errors on eigenvalues and eigenfunctions. A bootstrap method is used to prove the error estimates, which are expressed both in terms of \textit{finite element approximation error} and of \textit{geometric error}, respectively associated to the finite element degree and to the mesh order~. Numerical experiments are led on various smooth domains in 2D and 3D, which allow us to validate the presented theoretical results.
Paper Structure (32 sections, 14 theorems, 148 equations, 6 figures, 3 tables)

This paper contains 32 sections, 14 theorems, 148 equations, 6 figures, 3 tables.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

Let $\Omega$ be a nonempty bounded connected open subset of $\mathbb{R}^{d}$$(d~=~2,3)$ with a $\mathcal{C}^2$ boundary $\Gamma= \partial \Omega$. Let $\mathrm{d} : \mathbb{R}^d \to \mathbb{R}$ be the signed distance function with respect to $\Gamma$ defined by, Then there exists a tubular neighborhood $\mathcal{U}_{\Gamma}:= \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^d ; |\mathrm{d}(x)| < \delta_\Gamma \}$ of $\Gamma$

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Representation of the $6^{\rm th}$ eigenfunction computed using $\mathbb{P}^ 3$ finite element on a (coarse) mesh of $\Omega$: affine mesh (left) and quadratic mesh (right).
  • Figure 2: Display of the eigenfunction $U_6$ associated to the computed eigenvalue $\Lambda_6$ using $\mathbb{P}^ 3$ method on an affine mesh (left) and a quadratic mesh (right).
  • Figure 3: Display of the eigenfunction associated with the eigenvalue $\Lambda_{10}$ using $\mathbb{P}^ 2$ finite element on an affine mesh (left) and a quadratic mesh (right).
  • Figure 4: Display of the convergence rate of $e_{\lambda_{10}}=|\lambda_{10}-\Lambda_{10}|$ using $\mathbb{P}^ 2$ and $\mathbb{P}^ 3$ finite element on a quadratic mesh (left) and a cubic mesh (right).
  • Figure 5: Display of the convergence rate of $e_{\mathrm{L}^2}$ using $\mathbb{P}^ 2$ and $\mathbb{P}^ 3$ finite element on a quadratic mesh (left) and a cubic mesh (right).
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (37)

  • Proposition 2.1
  • Definition 3.1
  • Remark 3.1
  • Remark 4.1
  • Remark 4.2
  • Remark 5.1
  • Corollary 5.1
  • Proposition 5.1
  • proof
  • Corollary 5.2
  • ...and 27 more