Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Conditional algebras

Sergio Celani, Rafał Gruszczyński, Paula Menchón

TL;DR

This work develops a comprehensive algebraic theory for a binary conditional operator $\rightarrowtriangle$ that generalizes Chellas's conditional logic by aligning it with a unary necessity-like modality. It introduces conditional algebras $\mathsf{CA}$, builds ultrafilter and t-frame representations, and proves a representation theorem placing $\mathsf{CA}$ within full complex algebras $\operatorname{Em}(\mathfrak{A})$, while establishing canonical extensions and a π-/σ-extension framework. A central achievement is the term-equivalence between $\mathsf{CA}$ and multi-modal antitone algebras $\mathsf{MMA}$, enabling a rich duality theory—topological, categorical, and relational—between CA and categories of conditional spaces; this yields robust dualities, subalgebra/congruence characterizations, and a detailed analysis of subvarieties such as PSB, PsC, SIA, and $S^2IA$, including canonicity results. The results offer a unified, dualizable account of conditional reasoning in algebraic terms with precise correspondences between equational laws and spatial/first-second-order properties, paving the way for quasi-conditional extensions and connections to related contact/subordination frameworks. The framework has potential implications for modal correspondence theory, logic-algebra dualities, and semantic modeling of conditionals in formal epistemology and computer science.

Abstract

Drawing on the classic paper by Chellas "Basic conditional logic" (1975), we propose a general algebraic framework for studying a binary operation of conditional that models universal features of the "if..., then..." connective as strictly related to the unary modal necessity operator. To this end, we introduce a variety of conditional algebras, and we develop its duality and canonical extensions theory.

Conditional algebras

TL;DR

This work develops a comprehensive algebraic theory for a binary conditional operator that generalizes Chellas's conditional logic by aligning it with a unary necessity-like modality. It introduces conditional algebras , builds ultrafilter and t-frame representations, and proves a representation theorem placing within full complex algebras , while establishing canonical extensions and a π-/σ-extension framework. A central achievement is the term-equivalence between and multi-modal antitone algebras , enabling a rich duality theory—topological, categorical, and relational—between CA and categories of conditional spaces; this yields robust dualities, subalgebra/congruence characterizations, and a detailed analysis of subvarieties such as PSB, PsC, SIA, and , including canonicity results. The results offer a unified, dualizable account of conditional reasoning in algebraic terms with precise correspondences between equational laws and spatial/first-second-order properties, paving the way for quasi-conditional extensions and connections to related contact/subordination frameworks. The framework has potential implications for modal correspondence theory, logic-algebra dualities, and semantic modeling of conditionals in formal epistemology and computer science.

Abstract

Drawing on the classic paper by Chellas "Basic conditional logic" (1975), we propose a general algebraic framework for studying a binary operation of conditional that models universal features of the "if..., then..." connective as strictly related to the unary modal necessity operator. To this end, we introduce a variety of conditional algebras, and we develop its duality and canonical extensions theory.
Paper Structure (16 sections, 46 theorems, 104 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 16 sections, 46 theorems, 104 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

In every conditional algebra $\mathfrak{A}\coloneqq\langle A,\rightarrowtriangle\rangle$:

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: The poset of subvarieties of the variety of conditional algebras analyzed in Section \ref{['sec:subvarieties']}.

Theorems & Definitions (102)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Definition 2.3
  • Proposition 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Proposition 2.6
  • proof
  • ...and 92 more