Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A gerbe-like construction in gauge theory

Mitsuyoshi Adachi

TL;DR

The paper shows that for a smooth family of homotopy K3 surfaces, one can canonically lift the spin geometry from the fiber tangent data to the bundle of self-dual harmonic 2-forms, via an O(1) gerbe-theoretic framework and a finite-dimensional approximation to the Seiberg–Witten map. It constructs a canonical spin structure on $T_B\mathbb{X} \oplus \pi^*\mathcal{H}^+(\mathbb{X})$ and proves the obstruction class $\alpha$ for lifting to $\mathrm{Diff}^+(X,\mathfrak{s})$ equals the second Stiefel–Whitney class of $\mathcal{H}^+(\mathbb{X})$, while ensuring functoriality under base change and stabilization. The approach unites gauge-theoretic finite-dimensional models with a geometric interpretation via Spin(3) triples and $O(1)$-gerbes, yielding a canonical, globally defined spin structure on $\mathcal{H}^+(\mathbb{X})$ even when $T_B\mathbb{X}$ lacks a spin or spin^c structure. This advances the understanding of families Seiberg–Witten theory by providing explicit, canonical geometric objects associated to the self-dual form bundle and its interaction with the base geometry.

Abstract

In 2022 Baraglia and Konno showed the following: for a smooth family of a homotopy $K3$ surface $X \to \mathbb{X} \stackrelπ{\to} B$, if the tangent bundle along the fibers $T_B \mathbb{X}$ admits a spin structure, then $\mathcal{H}^+(\mathbb{X})$ also admits a spin structure, where $\mathcal{H}^+(\mathbb{X})$ is the vector bundle consisting of self-dual harmonic 2-forms. In this paper, we show that $T_B \mathbb{X} \oplus π^\ast \mathcal{H}^+(\mathbb{X})$ admits a canonical spin structure. The proof is carried out by canonically constructing a lifting $O(1)$-gerbe for the spin structure on $\mathcal{H}^+(\mathbb{X})$ using the families Seiberg--Witten equations, starting from a lifting $O(1)$-gerbe for the spin structure on $T_B \mathbb{X}$.

A gerbe-like construction in gauge theory

TL;DR

The paper shows that for a smooth family of homotopy K3 surfaces, one can canonically lift the spin geometry from the fiber tangent data to the bundle of self-dual harmonic 2-forms, via an O(1) gerbe-theoretic framework and a finite-dimensional approximation to the Seiberg–Witten map. It constructs a canonical spin structure on and proves the obstruction class for lifting to equals the second Stiefel–Whitney class of , while ensuring functoriality under base change and stabilization. The approach unites gauge-theoretic finite-dimensional models with a geometric interpretation via Spin(3) triples and -gerbes, yielding a canonical, globally defined spin structure on even when lacks a spin or spin^c structure. This advances the understanding of families Seiberg–Witten theory by providing explicit, canonical geometric objects associated to the self-dual form bundle and its interaction with the base geometry.

Abstract

In 2022 Baraglia and Konno showed the following: for a smooth family of a homotopy surface , if the tangent bundle along the fibers admits a spin structure, then also admits a spin structure, where is the vector bundle consisting of self-dual harmonic 2-forms. In this paper, we show that admits a canonical spin structure. The proof is carried out by canonically constructing a lifting -gerbe for the spin structure on using the families Seiberg--Witten equations, starting from a lifting -gerbe for the spin structure on .
Paper Structure (24 sections, 52 theorems, 424 equations)

This paper contains 24 sections, 52 theorems, 424 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $X$ be a homotopy $K3$ surface and $B$ a CW complex. Consider a smooth family of $X$ associated to a principal $\mathop{\mathrm{Diff}}\nolimits^+(X)$-bundle $\mathcal{E} \to B$. Choose a continuous family of smooth Riemannian metrics on $\mathbb{X}$. Fix an orientation on $\mathcal{H}^+(\mathbb{X})$. Then, we can construct a canonical spin structure on the vector bundle over $\mathb where den

Theorems & Definitions (130)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2: Morgan--SzabóMorgan--Szabo-homotopy-K3-1997
  • Theorem 1.3: Baraglia--KonnoBaraglia--Konno-2022
  • Definition 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Remark 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5
  • Remark 2.6
  • Definition 2.7
  • ...and 120 more