What does CLIP know about peeling a banana?
Claudia Cuttano, Gabriele Rosi, Gabriele Trivigno, Giuseppe Averta
TL;DR
The paper tackles affordance grounding by addressing the limitations of closed-action supervision through open-vocabulary reasoning with Vision-Language Models. It introduces AffordanceCLIP, which freezes CLIP and adds a lightweight Feature Pyramid Network to recover spatial details, trained with a pixel-text contrastive objective on referring segmentation data. The approach achieves competitive zero-shot performance on AGD20K and surpasses several weakly supervised baselines while using only a small number of learnable parameters, demonstrating open-world capability for action-object reasoning. This work highlights the potential of leveraging large multimodal models for functionality-based perception and lays the groundwork for future integration with even larger language-vision systems.
Abstract
Humans show an innate capability to identify tools to support specific actions. The association between objects parts and the actions they facilitate is usually named affordance. Being able to segment objects parts depending on the tasks they afford is crucial to enable intelligent robots to use objects of daily living. Traditional supervised learning methods for affordance segmentation require costly pixel-level annotations, while weakly supervised approaches, though less demanding, still rely on object-interaction examples and support a closed set of actions. These limitations hinder scalability, may introduce biases, and usually restrict models to a limited set of predefined actions. This paper proposes AffordanceCLIP, to overcome these limitations by leveraging the implicit affordance knowledge embedded within large pre-trained Vision-Language models like CLIP. We experimentally demonstrate that CLIP, although not explicitly trained for affordances detection, retains valuable information for the task. Our AffordanceCLIP achieves competitive zero-shot performance compared to methods with specialized training, while offering several advantages: i) it works with any action prompt, not just a predefined set; ii) it requires training only a small number of additional parameters compared to existing solutions and iii) eliminates the need for direct supervision on action-object pairs, opening new perspectives for functionality-based reasoning of models.
