Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Probabilistic estimates of the diameters of the Rubik's Cube groups

So Hirata

Abstract

The diameter of the Cayley graph of the Rubik's Cube group is the fewest number of turns needed to solve the Cube from the hardest initial configuration. For the 2$\times$2$\times$2 Cube, the diameter is 11 in the half-turn metric, 14 in the quarter-turn metric, 19 in the semi-quarter-turn metric, and 10 in the bi-quarter-turn metric. For the 3$\times$3$\times$3 Cube, the diameter was determined by Rokicki et al. to be 20 in the half-turn metric and 26 in the quarter-turn metric. This study shows that a modified version of the coupon collector's problem in probability theory can predict the diameters correctly for both 2$\times$2$\times$2 and 3$\times$3$\times$3 Cubes insofar as the quarter-turn metric is adopted. In the half-turn metric, the diameters are overestimated by one and two, respectively, for the 2$\times$2$\times$2 and 3$\times$3$\times$3 Cubes, whereas for the 2$\times$2$\times$2 Cube in the semi-quarter-turn and bi-quarter-turn metrics, they are overestimated by two and underestimated by one, respectively. Invoking the same probabilistic logic, the diameters of the 4$\times$4$\times$4 and 5$\times$5$\times$5 Cubes are predicted to be 48 (41) and 68 (58) in the quarter-turn (half-turn) metric, whose precise determinations are far beyond reach of classical supercomputing. The probabilistically estimated diameter is shown to obey the approximate formula of $\ln N / \ln r + \ln N / r$, where $N$ is the number of configurations and $r$ is the branching ratio.

Probabilistic estimates of the diameters of the Rubik's Cube groups

Abstract

The diameter of the Cayley graph of the Rubik's Cube group is the fewest number of turns needed to solve the Cube from the hardest initial configuration. For the 222 Cube, the diameter is 11 in the half-turn metric, 14 in the quarter-turn metric, 19 in the semi-quarter-turn metric, and 10 in the bi-quarter-turn metric. For the 333 Cube, the diameter was determined by Rokicki et al. to be 20 in the half-turn metric and 26 in the quarter-turn metric. This study shows that a modified version of the coupon collector's problem in probability theory can predict the diameters correctly for both 222 and 333 Cubes insofar as the quarter-turn metric is adopted. In the half-turn metric, the diameters are overestimated by one and two, respectively, for the 222 and 333 Cubes, whereas for the 222 Cube in the semi-quarter-turn and bi-quarter-turn metrics, they are overestimated by two and underestimated by one, respectively. Invoking the same probabilistic logic, the diameters of the 444 and 555 Cubes are predicted to be 48 (41) and 68 (58) in the quarter-turn (half-turn) metric, whose precise determinations are far beyond reach of classical supercomputing. The probabilistically estimated diameter is shown to obey the approximate formula of , where is the number of configurations and is the branching ratio.
Paper Structure (23 sections, 69 equations, 7 figures, 12 tables)

This paper contains 23 sections, 69 equations, 7 figures, 12 tables.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: The number of new (non-redundant) configurations of the 2$\times$2$\times$2 Cube generated in each step in the half-turn metric. A terminal plot (step 11 for the actual) corresponds to the diameter.
  • Figure 2: Same as Fig. \ref{['fig:2Hnews']} for the quarter-turn metric.
  • Figure 3: Same as Fig. \ref{['fig:2Hnews']} for the semi-quarter-turn metric.
  • Figure 4: Same as Fig. \ref{['fig:2Hnews']} for the bi-quarter-turn metric.
  • Figure 5: The number of new (non-redundant) configurations of the 3$\times$3$\times$3 Cube generated in each step in the square-turn metric.
  • ...and 2 more figures