Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Unveiling Decentralization: A Comprehensive Review of Technologies, Comparison, Challenges in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana Blockchain

Han Song, Yihao Wei, Zhongche Qu, Weihan Wang

TL;DR

The paper surveys three pivotal blockchain platforms—Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana—exploring decentralization, architectures, and core challenges. It details Bitcoin's UTXO/PoW model, Ethereum's account/gas/contract paradigm with PoS, and Solana's Proof of History augmented by a PoS layer to boost throughput. Key findings discuss energy efficiency, latency, scalability, and security trade-offs, including Bitcoin's $21,000,000$ supply cap and halving every $210,000$ blocks, Ethereum's dynamic gas mechanism, and Solana's time-ordered processing. The work provides a comparative lens for researchers, developers, and practitioners to assess design choices and future directions in decentralized platforms.

Abstract

Bitcoin stands as a groundbreaking development in decentralized exchange throughout human history, enabling transactions without the need for intermediaries. By leveraging cryptographic proof mechanisms, Bitcoin eliminates the reliance on third-party financial institutions. Ethereum, ranking as the second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, builds upon Bitcoin's groundwork by introducing smart contracts and decentralized applications. Ethereum strives to surpass the limitations of Bitcoin's scripting language, achieving full Turing-completeness for executing intricate computational tasks. Solana introduces a novel architecture for high-performance blockchain, employing timestamps to validate decentralized transactions and significantly boosting block creation throughput. Through a comprehensive examination of these blockchain technologies, their distinctions, and the associated challenges, this paper aims to offer valuable insights and comparative analysis for both researchers and practitioners.

Unveiling Decentralization: A Comprehensive Review of Technologies, Comparison, Challenges in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana Blockchain

TL;DR

The paper surveys three pivotal blockchain platforms—Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana—exploring decentralization, architectures, and core challenges. It details Bitcoin's UTXO/PoW model, Ethereum's account/gas/contract paradigm with PoS, and Solana's Proof of History augmented by a PoS layer to boost throughput. Key findings discuss energy efficiency, latency, scalability, and security trade-offs, including Bitcoin's supply cap and halving every blocks, Ethereum's dynamic gas mechanism, and Solana's time-ordered processing. The work provides a comparative lens for researchers, developers, and practitioners to assess design choices and future directions in decentralized platforms.

Abstract

Bitcoin stands as a groundbreaking development in decentralized exchange throughout human history, enabling transactions without the need for intermediaries. By leveraging cryptographic proof mechanisms, Bitcoin eliminates the reliance on third-party financial institutions. Ethereum, ranking as the second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, builds upon Bitcoin's groundwork by introducing smart contracts and decentralized applications. Ethereum strives to surpass the limitations of Bitcoin's scripting language, achieving full Turing-completeness for executing intricate computational tasks. Solana introduces a novel architecture for high-performance blockchain, employing timestamps to validate decentralized transactions and significantly boosting block creation throughput. Through a comprehensive examination of these blockchain technologies, their distinctions, and the associated challenges, this paper aims to offer valuable insights and comparative analysis for both researchers and practitioners.
Paper Structure (15 sections, 7 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 15 sections, 7 figures, 1 table.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: key pair encryption
  • Figure 2: Transactions are made with UTXO and every movement is recorded in the ledger
  • Figure 3: New Bitcoin generated rate decreases by half every four year
  • Figure 4: Externally owned account and Contract account have the same structure
  • Figure 5: Nodes have two layers as their clients communicates through different layers
  • ...and 2 more figures