A Map of Exploring Human Interaction patterns with LLM: Insights into Collaboration and Creativity
Jiayang Li, Jiale Li
TL;DR
This paper addresses the lack of focused mappings of human-LLM interaction by proposing a five-stage mapping procedure and applying it to 106 user-centered publications. By defining two analytical dimensions—Human-AI and Implement-Creation—and four AI roles, it clusters the literature into Processing Tool, Analysis Assistant, Creative Companion, and Processing Agent using manual scoring and K-means clustering. The resulting map clarifies how LLMs participate in collaboration and creativity, revealing a dominance of creative and autonomous roles and highlighting gaps such as explainability in mid-collaboration intervals. The methodology and resulting landscape provide a practical framework for evaluating current LLM-based systems and guiding future research in HAII patterns and AI-assisted creativity.
Abstract
The outstanding performance capabilities of large language model have driven the evolution of current AI system interaction patterns. This has led to considerable discussion within the Human-AI Interaction (HAII) community. Numerous studies explore this interaction from technical, design, and empirical perspectives. However, the majority of current literature reviews concentrate on interactions across the wider spectrum of AI, with limited attention given to the specific realm of interaction with LLM. We searched for articles on human interaction with LLM, selecting 110 relevant publications meeting consensus definition of Human-AI interaction. Subsequently, we developed a comprehensive Mapping Procedure, structured in five distinct stages, to systematically analyze and categorize the collected publications. Applying this methodical approach, we meticulously mapped the chosen studies, culminating in a detailed and insightful representation of the research landscape. Overall, our review presents an novel approach, introducing a distinctive mapping method, specifically tailored to evaluate human-LLM interaction patterns. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of the current research in related fields, employing clustering techniques for categorization, which enabled us to clearly delineate the status and challenges prevalent in each identified area.
