Table of Contents
Fetching ...

From quasi-symmetric to Schur expansions with applications to symmetric chain decompositions and plethysm

Rosa Orellana, Franco Saliola, Anne Schilling, Mike Zabrocki

TL;DR

This work addresses the problem of converting a known fundamental quasisymmetric expansion of a symmetric function into its Schur expansion by introducing a new right inverse of the Schur–fundamental transition that uses only partition-indexed coefficients and the quasi-Kostka matrix. The authors develop a combinatorial framework via the inverse quasi-Kostka matrix $\mathsf{Q}^{-1}$ and chains of quasi-Yamanouchi tableaux to express Schur coefficients $b_{\lambda}$ directly from quasisymmetric data, plus a submatrix technique for length-bounded cases. They apply this machinery to extract leading terms in plethysm and to compute Schur expansions of $s_{w}[s_{h}]$ for $w=2,3,4$ in two variables, supported by novel symmetric chain decompositions of Young’s lattice in $w\times h$ boxes with restriction, extension, and pattern properties. The results yield new combinatorial expressions for plethysm coefficients and, in particular, explicit formulas for two-variable plethysms, advancing understanding of Newton polytopes and the structure of plethysm coefficients.

Abstract

It is an important problem in algebraic combinatorics to deduce the Schur function expansion of a symmetric function whose expansion in terms of the fundamental quasisymmetric function is known. For example, formulas are known for the fundamental expansion of a Macdonald symmetric function and for the plethysm of two Schur functions, while the Schur expansions of these expressions are still elusive. Egge, Loehr and Warrington provided a method to obtain the Schur expansion from the fundamental expansion by replacing each quasisymmetric function by a Schur function (not necessarily indexed by a partition) and using straightening rules to obtain the Schur expansion. Here we provide a new method that only involves the coefficients of the quasisymmetric functions indexed by partitions and the quasi-Kostka matrix. As an application, we identify the lexicographically largest term in the Schur expansion of the plethysm of two Schur functions. We provide the Schur expansion of $s_w[s_h](x,y)$ for $w=2,3,4$ using novel symmetric chain decompositions of Young's lattice for partitions in a $w\times h$ box. For $w=4$, this is first known combinatorial expression for the coefficient of $s_λ$ in $s_{w}[s_{h}]$ for two-row partitions $λ$, and for $w=3$ the combinatorial expression is new.

From quasi-symmetric to Schur expansions with applications to symmetric chain decompositions and plethysm

TL;DR

This work addresses the problem of converting a known fundamental quasisymmetric expansion of a symmetric function into its Schur expansion by introducing a new right inverse of the Schur–fundamental transition that uses only partition-indexed coefficients and the quasi-Kostka matrix. The authors develop a combinatorial framework via the inverse quasi-Kostka matrix and chains of quasi-Yamanouchi tableaux to express Schur coefficients directly from quasisymmetric data, plus a submatrix technique for length-bounded cases. They apply this machinery to extract leading terms in plethysm and to compute Schur expansions of for in two variables, supported by novel symmetric chain decompositions of Young’s lattice in boxes with restriction, extension, and pattern properties. The results yield new combinatorial expressions for plethysm coefficients and, in particular, explicit formulas for two-variable plethysms, advancing understanding of Newton polytopes and the structure of plethysm coefficients.

Abstract

It is an important problem in algebraic combinatorics to deduce the Schur function expansion of a symmetric function whose expansion in terms of the fundamental quasisymmetric function is known. For example, formulas are known for the fundamental expansion of a Macdonald symmetric function and for the plethysm of two Schur functions, while the Schur expansions of these expressions are still elusive. Egge, Loehr and Warrington provided a method to obtain the Schur expansion from the fundamental expansion by replacing each quasisymmetric function by a Schur function (not necessarily indexed by a partition) and using straightening rules to obtain the Schur expansion. Here we provide a new method that only involves the coefficients of the quasisymmetric functions indexed by partitions and the quasi-Kostka matrix. As an application, we identify the lexicographically largest term in the Schur expansion of the plethysm of two Schur functions. We provide the Schur expansion of for using novel symmetric chain decompositions of Young's lattice for partitions in a box. For , this is first known combinatorial expression for the coefficient of in for two-row partitions , and for the combinatorial expression is new.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 14 theorems, 67 equations, 5 figures)

This paper contains 11 sections, 14 theorems, 67 equations, 5 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 3.4

For a partition $\lambda \vdash n$ and a composition $\alpha \models n$, we have

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: The symmetric chain decomposition for $L(3,10)$ satisfying the restriction and pattern conditions. The blue cells are the partitions representing the highest weights. The number entries indicate in which order boxes are added for the given chain.
  • Figure 2: Symmetric chain decomposition for $L(3, 10)$ matching that of Figure \ref{['fig:SCD-w3-C0']}. The blue edges follow rule 1, red edges follow rule 2, magenta edges follow rules 3,4 and 5, orange edges follow rules 6,7 and 8.
  • Figure 3: The symmetric chain decomposition for $L(4, 7)$ satisfying the restriction, extension and pattern condition. The chains are organized so that the elements of $L"(4,h)$ are all listed first, followed by the elements of $L'(4,h) \backslash L"(4,h)$, followed by the elements of $L(4,h) \backslash L'(4,h)$.
  • Figure 4: Lindstrom's Lindstrom1980, Wen's Wen2004, and our SCD of $L(3, 3)$
  • Figure 5: Our SCD of $L(4, 3)$

Theorems & Definitions (43)

  • Definition 2.1: AS.2017Wang.2019
  • Example 2.2
  • Definition 3.1
  • Example 3.2
  • Example 3.3
  • Proposition 3.4
  • proof
  • Corollary 3.5
  • Corollary 3.6
  • Theorem 3.7
  • ...and 33 more