Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Re-pseudonymization Strategies for Smart Meter Data Are Not Robust to Deep Learning Profiling Attacks

Ana-Maria Cretu, Miruna Rusu, Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that weekly re-pseudonymization of smart meter data is vulnerable to deep learning profiling attacks. It introduces a two-stage approach: (i) learn embeddings from weekly smart-meter records using six neural architectures and a triplet-loss objective, and (ii) perform nearest-neighbor matching across time to re-identify households. Across a large EDF UK dataset, the embedding-based attacks achieve substantial identification rates (e.g., up to 54.5% top-1 for electricity, up to 73.4% when combining electricity and gas), even when auxiliary data is limited or disjoint. The results persist as the reference population grows and transfer to unseen users, underscoring that weekly re-pseudonymization offers limited privacy protection and motivating adoption of privacy-preserving data sharing approaches such as query-based systems.

Abstract

Smart meters, devices measuring the electricity and gas consumption of a household, are currently being deployed at a fast rate throughout the world. The data they collect are extremely useful, including in the fight against climate change. However, these data and the information that can be inferred from them are highly sensitive. Re-pseudonymization, i.e., the frequent replacement of random identifiers over time, is widely used to share smart meter data while mitigating the risk of re-identification. We here show how, in spite of re-pseudonymization, households' consumption records can be pieced together with high accuracy in large-scale datasets. We propose the first deep learning-based profiling attack against re-pseudonymized smart meter data. Our attack combines neural network embeddings, which are used to extract features from weekly consumption records and are tailored to the smart meter identification task, with a nearest neighbor classifier. We evaluate six neural networks architectures as the embedding model. Our results suggest that the Transformer and CNN-LSTM architectures vastly outperform previous methods as well as other architectures, successfully identifying the correct household 73.4% of the time among 5139 households based on electricity and gas consumption records (54.5% for electricity only). We further show that the features extracted by the embedding model maintain their effectiveness when transferred to a set of users disjoint from the one used to train the model. Finally, we extensively evaluate the robustness of our results. Taken together, our results strongly suggest that even frequent re-pseudonymization strategies can be reversed, strongly limiting their ability to prevent re-identification in practice.

Re-pseudonymization Strategies for Smart Meter Data Are Not Robust to Deep Learning Profiling Attacks

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that weekly re-pseudonymization of smart meter data is vulnerable to deep learning profiling attacks. It introduces a two-stage approach: (i) learn embeddings from weekly smart-meter records using six neural architectures and a triplet-loss objective, and (ii) perform nearest-neighbor matching across time to re-identify households. Across a large EDF UK dataset, the embedding-based attacks achieve substantial identification rates (e.g., up to 54.5% top-1 for electricity, up to 73.4% when combining electricity and gas), even when auxiliary data is limited or disjoint. The results persist as the reference population grows and transfer to unseen users, underscoring that weekly re-pseudonymization offers limited privacy protection and motivating adoption of privacy-preserving data sharing approaches such as query-based systems.

Abstract

Smart meters, devices measuring the electricity and gas consumption of a household, are currently being deployed at a fast rate throughout the world. The data they collect are extremely useful, including in the fight against climate change. However, these data and the information that can be inferred from them are highly sensitive. Re-pseudonymization, i.e., the frequent replacement of random identifiers over time, is widely used to share smart meter data while mitigating the risk of re-identification. We here show how, in spite of re-pseudonymization, households' consumption records can be pieced together with high accuracy in large-scale datasets. We propose the first deep learning-based profiling attack against re-pseudonymized smart meter data. Our attack combines neural network embeddings, which are used to extract features from weekly consumption records and are tailored to the smart meter identification task, with a nearest neighbor classifier. We evaluate six neural networks architectures as the embedding model. Our results suggest that the Transformer and CNN-LSTM architectures vastly outperform previous methods as well as other architectures, successfully identifying the correct household 73.4% of the time among 5139 households based on electricity and gas consumption records (54.5% for electricity only). We further show that the features extracted by the embedding model maintain their effectiveness when transferred to a set of users disjoint from the one used to train the model. Finally, we extensively evaluate the robustness of our results. Taken together, our results strongly suggest that even frequent re-pseudonymization strategies can be reversed, strongly limiting their ability to prevent re-identification in practice.
Paper Structure (29 sections, 5 equations, 9 figures, 3 tables)

This paper contains 29 sections, 5 equations, 9 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: Profiling threat model. The attacker aims to reverse the re-pseudonymization by piecing together the target user's smart meter records from disjoint time periods $\mathcal{T}_1$ and $\mathcal{T}_2$.
  • Figure 2: Profiling attack pipeline.
  • Figure 3: Using RNNs for feature extraction.
  • Figure 4: Using a CNN-LSTM for feature extraction.
  • Figure 5: Scenario (I): Attack performance using different approaches. For the embedding-based approaches, we report the mean with standard deviation over 10 runs. All our embedding approaches are superior to the baselines, with the CNN-LSTM and the Transformer vastly outperforming them.
  • ...and 4 more figures