Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Additive approximation algorithm for geodesic centers in $δ$-hyperbolic graphs

Dibyayan Chakraborty, Yann Vaxès

TL;DR

This work studies the k-Geodesic Center problem on δ-hyperbolic graphs, seeking a set of $k$ isometric paths minimizing the maximum distance to any vertex. The authors introduce a coarse shallow-pairing property and reduce the problem to a rooted variant, delivering an additive $O(δ)$-approximation via a two-stage approach and a careful transformation from rooted to non-rooted solutions. They prove the method runs in $O(mn^2\log n)$ time and yields a $(6τ(G)+1)$-additive bound, with a exact polynomial-time solution on trees ($δ=0$). An NP-hardness result on partial grids is established by adapting a known reduction, highlighting limits in general graph classes. The paper also contributes the coarse pairing framework, which may be of independent interest for other tree-like graph problems and potential extensions to planar settings.

Abstract

For an integer $k\geq 1$, the objective of \textsc{$k$-Geodesic Center} is to find a set $\mathcal{C}$ of $k$ isometric paths such that the maximum distance between any vertex $v$ and $\mathcal{C}$ is minimised. Introduced by Gromov, \emph{$δ$-hyperbolicity} measures how treelike a graph is from a metric point of view. Our main contribution in this paper is to provide an additive $O(δ)$-approximation algorithm for \textsc{$k$-Geodesic Center} on $δ$-hyperbolic graphs. On the way, we define a coarse version of the pairing property introduced by Gerstel \& Zaks (Networks, 1994) and show it holds for $δ$-hyperbolic graphs. This result allows to reduce the \textsc{$k$-Geodesic Center} problem to its rooted counterpart, a main idea behind our algorithm. We also adapt a technique of Dragan \& Leitert, (TCS, 2017) to show that for every $k\geq 1$, $k$-\textsc{Geodesic Center} is NP-hard even on partial grids.

Additive approximation algorithm for geodesic centers in $δ$-hyperbolic graphs

TL;DR

This work studies the k-Geodesic Center problem on δ-hyperbolic graphs, seeking a set of isometric paths minimizing the maximum distance to any vertex. The authors introduce a coarse shallow-pairing property and reduce the problem to a rooted variant, delivering an additive -approximation via a two-stage approach and a careful transformation from rooted to non-rooted solutions. They prove the method runs in time and yields a -additive bound, with a exact polynomial-time solution on trees (). An NP-hardness result on partial grids is established by adapting a known reduction, highlighting limits in general graph classes. The paper also contributes the coarse pairing framework, which may be of independent interest for other tree-like graph problems and potential extensions to planar settings.

Abstract

For an integer , the objective of \textsc{-Geodesic Center} is to find a set of isometric paths such that the maximum distance between any vertex and is minimised. Introduced by Gromov, \emph{-hyperbolicity} measures how treelike a graph is from a metric point of view. Our main contribution in this paper is to provide an additive -approximation algorithm for \textsc{-Geodesic Center} on -hyperbolic graphs. On the way, we define a coarse version of the pairing property introduced by Gerstel \& Zaks (Networks, 1994) and show it holds for -hyperbolic graphs. This result allows to reduce the \textsc{-Geodesic Center} problem to its rooted counterpart, a main idea behind our algorithm. We also adapt a technique of Dragan \& Leitert, (TCS, 2017) to show that for every , -\textsc{Geodesic Center} is NP-hard even on partial grids.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 16 theorems, 5 equations, 3 figures, 3 algorithms)

This paper contains 11 sections, 16 theorems, 5 equations, 3 figures, 3 algorithms.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $G$ be a $\delta$-hyperbolic graph and $k$ be an integer. Then, there is a polynomial time $O(\delta)$-additive approximation algorithm for $k$-Geodesic Center on $G.$

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: A $\delta$-thin geodesic triangle
  • Figure 2: Illustrations for the two cases in the proof of \ref{['lem:rooted-paths']}.
  • Figure 3: Illustration of the notations used in Proof of \ref{['lem:shallow-pairing-bound']}.

Theorems & Definitions (17)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Proposition 3: AlBrCoFeLuMiShShBrHagromov1987
  • Lemma 4: chakraborty2023
  • Lemma 5: GeZa
  • Definition 6: $\gamma$-shallow pairing
  • Lemma 7
  • Lemma 8
  • Proposition 9
  • Theorem 10
  • ...and 7 more