Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Permissible Knowledge Pooling

Huimin Dong

TL;DR

The paper develops a normative, dynamic epistemic framework for permissible knowledge pooling in multi-agent systems. It introduces agent-dependent knowledge $K^a_b$, a dynamic sharing operator $[a\smalltriangleright b]$, and deontic notions for permission to know $P_a\varphi$ and to pool knowledge dynamically $P(a\smalltriangleright b)$, along with static and dynamic logics AK and IKS and their completeness. The contributions include explicit semantics, non-reductionist axiomatizations, and extended models that capture permission-structured knowledge transfer, bridging individual, distributed, and collective knowledge while respecting ethical constraints. This formalism supports privacy-preserving information sharing, governance of knowledge flows, and analysis of epistemic-ethical interactions in distributed systems, with potential applications to GDPR-style data sharing and social dependence analyses.

Abstract

Information pooling has been extensively formalised across various logical frameworks in distributed systems, characterized by diverse information-sharing patterns. These approaches generally adopt an intersection perspective, aggregating all possible information, regardless of whether it is known or unknown to the agents. In contrast, this work adopts a unique stance, emphasising that sharing knowledge means distributing what is known, rather than what remains uncertain. This paper introduces new modal logics for knowledge pooling and sharing, ranging from a novel language of knowledge pooling to a dynamic mechanism for knowledge sharing. It also outlines their axiomatizations and discusses a potential framework for permissible knowledge pooling.

Permissible Knowledge Pooling

TL;DR

The paper develops a normative, dynamic epistemic framework for permissible knowledge pooling in multi-agent systems. It introduces agent-dependent knowledge , a dynamic sharing operator , and deontic notions for permission to know and to pool knowledge dynamically , along with static and dynamic logics AK and IKS and their completeness. The contributions include explicit semantics, non-reductionist axiomatizations, and extended models that capture permission-structured knowledge transfer, bridging individual, distributed, and collective knowledge while respecting ethical constraints. This formalism supports privacy-preserving information sharing, governance of knowledge flows, and analysis of epistemic-ethical interactions in distributed systems, with potential applications to GDPR-style data sharing and social dependence analyses.

Abstract

Information pooling has been extensively formalised across various logical frameworks in distributed systems, characterized by diverse information-sharing patterns. These approaches generally adopt an intersection perspective, aggregating all possible information, regardless of whether it is known or unknown to the agents. In contrast, this work adopts a unique stance, emphasising that sharing knowledge means distributing what is known, rather than what remains uncertain. This paper introduces new modal logics for knowledge pooling and sharing, ranging from a novel language of knowledge pooling to a dynamic mechanism for knowledge sharing. It also outlines their axiomatizations and discusses a potential framework for permissible knowledge pooling.
Paper Structure (17 sections, 33 theorems, 31 equations, 6 figures)

This paper contains 17 sections, 33 theorems, 31 equations, 6 figures.

Key Result

lemma 1

Let $M|_{a \smalltriangleright b} = \langle W, \{R^*_i\}_{i \in \mathcal{I}}, V\rangle$ be a $(a \smalltriangleright b)$-updated model.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Knowledge sharing: Beyond the aggregation of arbitrary information for distributed knowledge.
  • Figure 2: From information pooling to knowledge sharing.
  • Figure 3: Two different directions of knowledge sharing
  • Figure 4: Expressivity
  • Figure 5: Axiomatization AK
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (65)

  • definition 1: Language
  • definition 2: Models
  • definition 3: Updated Model
  • lemma 1
  • proof
  • proposition 1
  • proposition 2
  • proposition 3
  • proposition 4
  • proposition 5
  • ...and 55 more