Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Main topics of the NumHyp-2015' discussion session

Denys Dutykh, Laurent Gosse

Abstract

Three main topics were raised in this discussion session, which took place on the 19th of June at the NumHyp-2015 meeting: nonlinear resonance for 1D systems of balance laws, dispersive extensions of standard hyperbolic conservation laws, and the validation of weakly dispersive shallow water wave models. An introductory overview with many bibliographic references is provided for all these topics. Based on kinetic formulation, a numerical strategy that can overcome resonance issues is presented, and a well-balanced (WB) technique for Vlasov-Fokker-Planck equations is outlined. This WB scheme relies on the spectral representation of stationary solutions.

Main topics of the NumHyp-2015' discussion session

Abstract

Three main topics were raised in this discussion session, which took place on the 19th of June at the NumHyp-2015 meeting: nonlinear resonance for 1D systems of balance laws, dispersive extensions of standard hyperbolic conservation laws, and the validation of weakly dispersive shallow water wave models. An introductory overview with many bibliographic references is provided for all these topics. Based on kinetic formulation, a numerical strategy that can overcome resonance issues is presented, and a well-balanced (WB) technique for Vlasov-Fokker-Planck equations is outlined. This WB scheme relies on the spectral representation of stationary solutions.
Paper Structure (16 sections, 41 equations, 4 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 16 sections, 41 equations, 4 figures, 1 table.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 4: Conformal map of the physical domain into a uniform strip.
  • Figure 5: Iso-horizontal (left) and iso-vertical (right) velocities under a large solitary wave. Lines correspond to the iso-values computed in the 'fixed' Frame of reference where the the fluid is at rest in the far field $x\to\pm\infty$. Taken from Dutykh2013b.
  • Figure 6: Speed--amplitude relations for solitary waves in SGN, eSGN and the full Euler equations ($\alpha = 6/5$).
  • Figure 7: Comparison of the runup reduction effect for various ad-hoc friction terms and the random bottom perturbation model. The horizontal axis represents the friction coefficient $c_f$ for deterministic computations and $\sigma$ for the random roughness model (blue solid line).